[Topics]

“Female eugenics”

Written: 2019-07-13
Addition: 2019-07-29
Addition: 2019-12-13
Addition: 2021-09-26

Probably one of the most brain-damaged ideas ever to occur to someone. Wish it were true, because then I would have been spared this awful existence. But it isn’t, and those who claim it is are mentally deranged.

Woman are just as superficial as men when it comes to sexual attraction. Eugenics only works when capable, intelligent men supervise it, or when, as Gómez Dávila calls it, a society’s “biological reason” is functioning properly. Otherwise you’ll get tons of mentally ill, ugly, dumb and immoral people. Quasimodos like myself.

Wake up, you idiots. Women are human; they are sinners; they aren’t God. And while there surely are many women who are smarter than many men*, they aren’t smarter on average. So what do you expect, you imbeciles? Not that men are any better. The whole point of eugenics is that not everyone who has children has good genes, is a “winner” or whatever.


(2019-12-13): [Topic]

And yet, for one gifted girl, there are around seven gifted boys.


(2021-09-26): [Topic]

Luckily, I am not the only one who sees through this nonsense. I remember reading a comment where someone wrote something along the lines of: “… and women don’t have bad genetics?”

Further, what’s laughable is that these guys see themselves as so-called “alphas” or “desirable” men who are “aloof” but still put women on a pedestal by subscribing to such a ridiculous view: thinking, in the end, that all women are “goddesses”.

Another way this view got expressed was in a comment on Vox Day’s blog by the moderator Snidely Whiplash, who wrote, apparently meant as an insult, … you have never been touched by a woman. Well, who cares. Good genetics would also entail character, temperament, mental health and intelligence. But I wrote about this elsewhere.