There exists no “physics” of love.

Because the last entry also dealt with this topic again, I want to make clear now for the umpteenth time that no “physics”, no “mechanics” of love will or ever can exist. It is shallow and a disgrace that so many people seem to want to be experts on a subject that obviously cannot be rationally explained because it is by its very nature irrational. It is as annoying as most theology by people who really know what God is thinking.

Read Schopenhauer’s Metaphysics of Sexual Love or so, but spare us your ridiculous “expert knowledge” when we all can see, with our own eyes, that there is no rhyme or reason as to why a woman or man fancy each other. None at all. They cannot even explain it themselves. Which is no wonder given that it is irrational.

It is therefore laughable to claim that there ever could be a kind of authoritative work, titled Lectures on Love by some Feynman, or in this case, Loveman, or rather, Lewdman.

More Colombian dynamite by Don Colacho:

The problem is not sexual repression, nor sexual liberation, but sex.

This century has succeeded in turning sex into a trivial activity and an odious topic.

The 19th century did not live with more anguish because of its sexual repression than the 20th century with its sexual liberation.
Identical obsession, even when the symptoms are the opposite.

Sex does not solve even sexual problems.

In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in corrupting.

It is above all against what the crowd proclaims to be “natural” that the noble soul rebels.

To liberate man is to subject him to greed and sex.