[Topics]
“God gave you your body, IQ, whatever”
Written: 2019-09-11
Addition: 2019-09-19
Addition: 2019-10-04
Addition: 2019-10-16
Addition:
2019-10-28
Addition:
2019-11-23
Addition: 2020-01-01 (small additions)
Addition:
2020-01-20
You often read about the talents and gifts God gave someone. This
often gets mentioned when someone supposedly “wasted” his
“God-given” talents (the fact that a women on Vox Day’s blog
uttered the same view should give one pause.)
But did God give me my hunchback? My ugliness? Mental illness? Why
does God heal the sick? If Christ—God—healed the sick, why would He
create them in the first place? And especially now, where Christ is
not with us to heal us – at least in a purely physical sense of
healing blindness itself, for example. Science can’t fix deleterious
genes. The best we have is eugenics, and that’s
unlikely to happen, unfortunately.
(If someone would be tempted to quote the famous verse of Romans 9
regarding the potter and the clay, I’d first like to know how he
would feel if he’d be in certain people’s positions. After all, I
am enduring my existence thanks to my faith, though I simply
reject the cockiness of some regarding genetic illnesses, especially
those who don’t or hardly have any. Besides, I think that this verse
has more to do with Israel.)
Genetic defects are the result of having to live in a fallen
world – worse, a world where almost no one is trying to fix this,
and where those who do try are insulted as “Nazis”, “racists” and
whatnot. Yeah, right. Man prides himself on all kinds of achievements,
especially those of a technological nature, but he is unable to
get something as basic as health right.
We cannot even produce healthy offspring and then they praise
man with this nonsense? The fact that a piece of trash
like me exists should fill us with shame.
So where did this nonsense come from? For example, if I had children,
the likelihood that they would be the same ugly hunchbacked losers
like myself is very high, especially if they turn out male. My father
is a hunchback, and his father was one. I am one myself. This is
not hard to figure out. If God has any bearing on our genes, then
He is very limited in His ability. Two Swedes won’t have a black
or Chinese child. Why? Because the genes determine who you
will become. The genes of your parents. This is not
hard to figure out.
Which is why I remain sceptical of this interpretation. Some people
have a really awful and horrible life due to their genes. As I
already said: were I not a Christian, I would kill myself instantly.
“Waiting to die”—you are an imbecile, Doktor Jeep! I have been living
with this mindset since I’m 16. I hated life and existence from an
early age. Job curses his birth but is seen as a pious man. Same with
Jeremiah. I cited the verses above.
So many people, even those who call themselves Christians, like showing
off, like denigrating “losers” (see the whole hierarchy stuff). But
no matter if it’s nature or God who gave you your genetics, you have
no control over it either way.
Since we have free will, God is not actively “creating” human beings
but people, with better or worse genes, choose to have them – or don’t,
given how many are “accidents”, and how it is usually their lust and
nothing else that is responsible for foisting another poor soul into
this pretty horrible and tedious world.
I am therefore convinced that our bodies, including our looks and IQ
et cetera, are the result of chance. God gives us the soul, which no
man can create; not that man is able to create a body either, but
as I wrote above, it is only through
the sex drive—which, trite, modern trash theology notwithstanding, is
not holy or sacred—it is only through this wicked sex drive that man
would bring another being into this world.
To quote from
Bruce Charlton: The Genius Famine:
The message seems to be that in pre-industrial Europe (before about
1800-1850) natural selection on humans operated mostly via mortality
rates – especially child mortality rates. An average of more than half
of children would die before adulthood, but this consisted of near
total mortality rates among the children of the poor, and ill, and of
low intelligence or ‘feckless’ personality; whereas among the skilled
middle classes (clerks, merchants, lawyers, doctors etc.) the mortality
rates were lower and fertility (number of births) was high.
Does this now mean that God wanted them dead? And nowadays, He does
not anymore?
And that one shall be “productive”, or even “successful” in one’s society
is not mentioned anywhere in the Bible. Paul writes that whoever does not
work, neither shall he eat – but this does not entail climbing the
social status ladder.
On a Christian web site, I read a response to an email where someone
complained and asked why she was ugly. And part of the response was
something along the lines of “maybe God wanted you to work with
average looking people”.
“… God wanted you …” – Did God incite lust in one’s parents? I’m
not writing this to be disgusting, just to demonstrate that I find
the notion that God has anything to do with people having children
to be rather on the speculative side – not to mention that it’s a
rather vulgar view. For we know how easily people nowadays fall
in “love” and out of it again – or, worse, how they just “hook
up” and have sex.
Gómez Dávila:
God does not ask for our “cooperation,” but for our humility.