I don’t think there is a depopulation agenda.

Unfortunately, Andy Nowicki, with whom I otherwise share some important views—most importantly, my anti-sex outlook—seems to believe that the Covid vaccine stuff is part of a depopulation agenda. He even said, in a podcast titled ‘Morgcast’ (ep #20): “The Rise And Fall of the Alt-Right”, that eugenics really never was gone or so.

To which I reply that in sub-saharan (or black) Africa, a million children are born each month, whereas in Germany, not even a million are born each year. And in the latter case, they aren’t all Germans anyway.

Given that it is mostly the developed nations, i. e. the West, that is being targeted here, I don’t see how this makes much sense. Shouldn’t they rather focus on India, China, Africa? Especially since the West’s population—maybe exempting China—is a lot better educated and therefore should be of greater interest for the “elites”. They, too, rely on engineering being done and prefer to live in societies that aren’t completely dysfunctional.

Not only intelligence, but traits like conscientiousness are more widely distributed among Europeans. This also goes for simply being on time, at least in central and northern Europe. I remember reading an article where a female German physician said she is waiting for the Arab translator to show up, who is 45 minutes late. Addin “different cultures, different manners”. To which a reader replied that “no, if this becomes the norm, Germany will no longer be known for its order, hard work and timeliness.” It was a left-leaning publication even he commented on.

Eugenics would entail consiously selecting for certain traits, like looks, intelligence or character and temperament. Sir Francis Galton himself was not in favor of negative eugenics, he was mostly concerned with the capable Brits no longer having as many children as in centuries past.

Further, the West has been in decline for a long time now. Sexual morals loosened around the 70s, paving the way for the mess and sad state of affairs we are in now. Birthrates are low in Japan, too, which suggests that it is not only related to religion, but a result of living in wealthy, developed and overall saturated societies. Though even in Japan, nihilism may have replaced whatever structured their societies in the past.

People kill—“abort”—their children or use contraception often enough without being forced to. It is a kind of lifestyle choice. In Germany, women, on average, marry the first time when they are thirty (!).

One could argue that our culture is wicked, and that those who are pushing moral degeneracy onto us do so knowing full well how man “ticks”; they are able to exploit our base desires, especially of those who are in their youth and twenties, where, apparently, some think they’ll never get older. On the other hand, Christians believe that we are accountable for our behaviour and that no one is free of sin before God.

In 1934, J. D. Unwin published Sex and Culture, wherein he laid out that in five thousand years of history, sexual promiscuity has always been a symptom of societies in decay. We are morally corrupt, that is why we are falling, to quote YouTuber Aarvoll from one of his latest videos on Nick Fuentes. Here, I certainly agree, though reason for this corruption also lies in the quasi-atheism Aarvoll defends.

Besides E. Michael Jones’ Libido dominandi, I will mention another work of interest. Namely, Ryszard Legutko’s “The Demon in Democracy. Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies.” On p. 111, he writes:

The cult of pleasure that once ignited the revolutionary flame does not cause great excitement today. People have more fun and fun is still what people are said to be after, but these pursuits did not bring happiness to human life. Contemporary literature describing the condition of sexually liberated man depicts a rather gloomy picture of despair and senselessness. Yet the existential vacuum in which the modern man found himself after the revolution did not diminish the continued onslaught of sexual politics on society. The institutionalization of sex closed the road that was once opened to man by hedonism, and made void all the promises of what could be found on this road. New promises would sound hollow, as one cannot go further than sex. One cannot indicate other human experience, which would be more basic and more democratic, luring people with more tempting illusions of liberation, giving more intense pleasures and being more correlated with episodic existence. The only thing that can happen to people and societies going along this road is a continuation of the same sexual policy, which, perpetuated by a bureaucratic routine, will become even more ruthless.

Therefore, I add, everyone who supports sexual promiscuous lifestyles is almost worse than a murderer.

And what use is my existence? I am not only an ugly hunchback, on top of that I also suffer from endogenic depression and my kind of autistic personality, which makes it hard for me to interact with people. I feel out of place, out of touch with this world, as if I don’t belong here. To quote Nowicki himself, I also am of a “killjoyish” melancholic temperament. I don’t see why I should risk forcing someone else into this world who will suffer like I do, or who may even commit suicide. Obviously, my parents and ancestors did not suffer the way I do, otherwise the chain would have been broken some time in the past. It will certainly be broken by me, which is not hard to do given that I don’t have a lot of appeal to women and am already in my thirties. I also lack diplomas of any sort; all I’ve got is ten years of school.

I don’t even work. I can’t work. I am living on a disablity income and my parents’ money. I am glad when my life is over. While my biological father is a narcissist and psychopath, I cannot even be angry towards him anymore; I want it to be over. I am a failure and cannot even defend Christ, have not succeeded in bringing anyone to Christ. What use, then, is my continued existence? I sometimes wonder if, at some point, I may have to sacrifice my life. On the other hand, this may be egotistic, and I’ll just have to grow old and die in loneliness.

I certainly fear Hell. While only God is able to read our hearts, I am not seeing a lot of faith around me here. In the West in general. Who will be saved? Do people still fear God in the West? And if not, where are our souls headed then? Questions I don’t even want to think about much. Atheists need to be crushed (intellectually), their evil worldview stinks.

Quoting anti-sex Catholic reactionary Gómez Dávila, who, despite his views, was not spiteful or embittered:

Eugenics appals those who fear its judgment.

No beneficiary of slaves is supporter of birth control.

Depopulate and reforest – first civilizing rule.

Although it grieves the angelism of the democrat: one cannot build a civilisation with miserable biological material.

The two most pressing problems of the contemporary world: demographic expansion and genetic deterioration are unsolvable.
Liberal principles prevent the solution of the first, egalitarian ones that of the second.