[Topics]
Andrew Tate is vermin, listening to him is worse than murder.
One of the most obscene persons I have ever heard of; did not even know
him. I prefer reading to listening, and yet, I again made the mistake of
tuning in to one of his videos. He denies depression exists, though
what he means seems more like arguing over semantics.
In a
debate
(or whatever) with Piers Morgan, he says (around 06:48) he refuses
to accept that we live in a world where God is creating people who
cannot become happy, contented individuals no matter how hard they work,
adding I don’t accept that!
He further said that he accepts that the universe is a very giving
place and that God loves all of us so that when you try your best
and work hard you become a better person.
This is all so wrong and false, I do not know where to start. First
off, who is his God anyway? Certainly not Christ, because He never
taught anything like this. In fact, the Bible is full with examples
of suffering; the Book of Job alone would disprove his views.
They are just that: personal, subjective views. He certainly is a
narcissist by thinking his refusal to accept something means that
it is false. If you are born with genetic diseases, why would you
be happy about it? Would he want to sit in a wheelchair, for example?
This universe is not a “very giving place,” since sin reigns in it.
It is fallen and ripe with injustice. How was it giving to
lose one’s nose or jawbone in World War I? Or to lose three sons
at once in World War II? How shallow can people be?
His claim of an IQ above 148 is laughable; apparently, anyone can
claim this. He seems like an average bloke instead, who wallows in
a superficial lifestyle I would pay money for not having to live it.
Even if you work hard, this does not mean that you cannot be
depressed. Pascal, Spengler, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard
worked very hard and still suffered mentally.
God is also no longer creating people, as I have
written about earlier.
We live because of lust, I have to suffer due to my father’s
disgusting horniness. God had nothing to do with my existence,
because then He would also kill those who die in the womb or during
infancy. Further, genetic diseases exists and get passed on because
we are too weak to implement eugenics.
He even said that people like Chester Bennington, who kill
themselves despite having children are an embarrassment, they will
never be men. Yet, this guy boasts about the many women he had or
has, meaning he is part of those who have destroyed marriage.
Which has increased rates of depression. Maybe this is why he
rejects the existence of depression? He wants to live a deranged
life without consequences.
In The Closing of the American Mind, published in 1987,
Allan Bloom wrote that children are more accepting of the death
of a parent than divorce, because the latter is a result of
free will, of one’s own choice.
His claims are totally false; neither does depression not exist,
nor does the Bible teach that one will live a happy life in this
world.
I have quoted
Nils M. Holm
before, who wrote about how a good amount of people with IQs that
are three standard deviations above the mean suffer in life.
This world is so horrible, that such people get air time on end while
smarter, deeper thinking individuals are ignored or even cancelled is
another proof for how fallen it is.
Andrew Tate is a vulgar person, a criminal even! His popularity is proof
of how shallow and crude this world has become.
In other videos where he was just running off the mouth, he was also
making use of extremely vile and foul language. He very much is a prole.
Tate was talking of some kind of “matrix.” This is itself imbecilic; and
why would I care about what he thinks constitutes a “good” life? I do not
care about cars or decadent sexual esacapdes. I would rather live in another
century that is less vulgar, if I have to live at all.
Which brings me to another point: if God does not exist, then it is of
no importance if I commit suicide or not in the grand scheme of things.
If He does exist, which is what I believe, then Andrew Tate is wrong
anyway, and everyone ought not to believe in some vague “power” of one’s
own mind, but in Christ.
It is nonsense anyway to think that the society and its customs do not
influence your own mood; as if this repugnant Western society which
is going downhill fast is worth living in. Families are broken,
education has been destroyed, borders are no longer existing, people
from hostile nations are flooding in. How would I be able to ignore
this and much more, especially since children are involved who have
to grow up in this mess? Only if you are a psychopath.
Apart from that, Chris Langan, who is a million times more intelligent
than this smart aleck, said himself he could not afford a family.
It is theologically wrong anyway that poverty, illness and death
could ever be abolished.
Which means that Andrew Tate’s God is not Christ; in a civilized
society, he would be in jail or sentenced to death.
Tate is so-called controlled opposition.
Even Vox Day
thinks so:
https://archive.ph/vxrVh
(archive.org).
(See also https://archive.ph/F6xPQ
[archive.org].)
Further, instead of amassing useless flivver like his Bugatti, men
of taste and good breeding would use their money (he does not have any
anyway) to build libraries, monasteries, cathedrals or, like King Ludwig
II., great castles like Castle Neuschwanstein et cetera. Or use it
in such a way that one does not need to think about it, living a quiet
existence dedicated to thinking and contemplating, a life of the mind.
(Vox Day notes, too, that those who travel a lot usually are not rich.)
Obviously, he is not a Christian, even bragging about the need to have
four wives – “as Allah intended”, he adds. With whom he does not simply
mean the Arabian word for God. He is alluding to Islam.
Ten to twelve children, growing up without a father: he even notes
that no one has said anything bad about his behaviour regarding
his family life (ten children, multiple wives). How is this alpha?
Why care about other people’s opinion?
It’s obvious he is controlled opposition. Further, if it’s true
that he has ten children with multiple women, this means we are
watching dysgenics in real time (is he even white?) Who then also
grow up in a sub-optimal fashion, namely without a father. Which
has been shown to have detrimental effects on one’s mental health
and so-called “life outcomes”.
A train wreck.
A quick update: he rejects books, he does not read. Not a big surprise:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzpgqrzZ-KE.
Reading is a “cheap way of entertainment”, for those with “slow brains”,
he needs action – driving fast cars, fighting or fornicating.
Worse (and I quote!): “I’m too smart to read”,
“‘Smart people read books.’ No.” (I’m not kidding, he said this!)
What an imbecile …
According to online sources, Tate’s father Emory is even taller than
Andrew Tate himself. Without wanting to make fun of someone’s appearance:
weighing around 70 kilogram while being 6’4 sounds more as if his
father was a kind of nerd, a Steve Oerkel … which may or may not be
the reason for this crude masculinity he forces down our throats.
Thankfully, I am allowed to quote Nicolás Gómez Dávila:
Where Christianity disappears, greed, envy, and lust invent a
thousand ideologies to justify themselves.
Intellectual vulgarity depresses me more than bad news.
The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.
Each day it becomes easier to know what we ought to despise: what
modern man admires and journalism praises.
The great industrial trade fairs are the showcase of everything
civilization does not require.
Evil promises what it cannot deliver on.
Good delivers on what it does not know how to promise.
The rich man, in capitalist society, does not know how to put
money to its best use: so that he does not have to think about it.
Good breeding seems like a fragrance from the 18th century
that evaporated.
In a century where the media publish endless stupidities, the cultured
man is defined not by what he knows but what he does not know.
The problem is not sexual repression, nor sexual liberation, but sex.
Reeducating man will consist of teaching him once again to value
objects correctly: that is, to need few.
It is impossible to convince the fool that there are pleasures superior to
those we share with the rest of the animals.
The majority of men have no right to give their opinion, but only to
listen.
Modern man’s life oscillates between two poles: business and sex.
It turns out it is impossible to convince a businessman that a profitable
activity can be immoral.