Yarvin Curtis aka Mencius Moldbug is a vulgar imbecile.

No idea why this guy should be so important. I glanced over his writing and got soaked in vulgarity after a few seconds of reading.

Dried wolf dick … what …?

Almost worse: he seems to buy into the lie that medieval Europe was “dark” through and through, showing his horrible education, or lack thereof. It is questionable anyway how many died of breast cancer, there were far more illnesses that could have killed you. Not inspiring much confidence in thinking he knows much or has refined taste and interests. To quote Gómez Dávila:

To discover the fool there is no better reagent than the word “medieval.”
He immediately sees red.

His language is that of a computer programmer, not someone who grew up on reading high literature. Why else use a laughable chapter title like How to Uninstall a Cathedral? Or slang like pwned? He does not shy away from writing utter crap or crappy numerous times, which is just more evidence for what Paul Fussell called prole drift.

He is a servant of Satan anyway, he is way out of his league here. Why does he think he has any idea on how to “build” a state? Quote:

Enter Patchwork, Mencius Moldbug’s inspiring vision of a political system for the 21st century. Patchwork’s innovative design, which relies on sovereign joint-stock republics with cryptographic governance, brings the promise of clean streets, negligible crime, invincible robot armies, and world peace.

Has to be rejected, is false and will always be since our world is fallen. This is just more leftist utopism, same nonsense. You are not a Carl Schmitt at all, just another loser with a keyboard, like myself.

These guys are not reactionaries, they are bad-mannered imbeciles drunk on science and technology. Most likely also sex-obsessed like his fellow NRxer James A. Donald.

He certainly is, since he takes “game” seriously, or at least allows the hosting of articles by Chateau Heartiste, which is awful trash most likely written by a fed. He at least gave permission for the site and even receives money for the awful junk he wrote. I quote:

Although Moldbug himself has retired from UR, this site and the various ebooks have been prepared with his permission, and he receives all royalties from sales.

If such intellectual losers would preach to their small circle in a discotheque only, where they—to quote a phrase Vox Day over-uses, which he most likely got from Nietzsche*, but it is fitting—play secret king and leave us of better taste and manners alone, I would not even be aware of the cheesy, tacky, vulgar drivel they churn out.

– Morons like “Roissy”, though, were quoted and linked to en masse in the so-called Alt Right blogosphere …! They aren’t even ashamed of their crude and brutish views …

This red pill parlance is infantile anyway, as Andy Nowicki once remarked.

Why would I spend even five minutes reading this dung? I have already wasted enough time with such useless authors, and there are always more interesting books to read.

This is a waste of time, I’d rather read Donoso Cortés or Nicolás Gómez Dávila. The latter I am now going quote, as always:

Intellectual vulgarity depresses me more than bad news.

The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.

In a perfect penal code, vulgarity would be punished with the death penalty.

When it finishes its “ascent,” humanity will find tedium waiting for it, seated on the highest peak.

It is fine to demand that the imbecile respect arts, letters, philosophy, the sciences, but let him respect them in silence.

The modern world demands that we approve what it should not even dare ask us to tolerate.

The city imagined by every utopian is always tacky—beginning with that of the Apocalypse.

Dialogue with the imbecile poses difficulties: we never know where we harm him, when we scandalize him, [or] how we please him.

Searching for Nietzsche secret king brings up deranged PUA imbeciles, some of them even denigrating Nietzsche – as if they are at his level: Gómez Dávila was Catholic and knew that Nietzsche, despite being in the wrong, was a man of high intellectual calibre and good breeding. Unlike the sex-obsessed, who prefer denigrating themselves in order to “win”. Quoting Gómez Dávila: “Capable men accept degrading themselves in order to triumph.
And eventually they fail because they degraded themselves.”