[Topics]
“Game”
This is easy. If you are a Quasimodo, no amount of “game” will hide that.
If a woman looks at you as if she just stepped in dog excrements, you know
that these guys who tell you that what matters is only your “game” are truly
living in a fantasy world. Similar to those who believe that genes do not
influence intelligence.
Further, someone with a quiet personality will hardly be able to turn into
the opposite and vice versa.
I don’t support his Mickey Mouse atheism, or his generally superficial
views; not a very bright guy for sure, but the following quote is
fitting. He is a good example for why a degree in philosophy is laughable.
Compare his life to that of a great thinker, especially Nietzsche, whom
he cites himself. The contrast couldn’t be starker.
Recognize a pattern here? Another guy who was sex-obsessed – another
shallow mind.
His situation was awful, but his opinions are worse, and the life
he led before his accident was vulgar and decadent. Also a good example
of how unimportant we are. He will be forgotten. He is not a
Nietzsche—and would have never become one—, whose life has been
studied intensely. Which is bearable, if one trusts in Christ.
(But regarding God and meaning, I have written enough elsewhere
on these pages.)
Gómez Dávila provides us with five fitting aphorisms:
The greater the importance of an intellectual activity, the more
ridiculous the pretension in enhancing the competence of one who
carries it out.
A dentistry degree is respectable, but a philosophy degree is
grotesque.
Modern man’s misfortune lies not in having to live a mediocre
life, but in believing that he could live a life that is not
mediocre.
A noble society does not wait for catastrophes to discipline
it before it disciplines itself.
The book that “today’s youth” adopts needs to do decades of
penance to atone for the silly ideas it inspires.
The arguments with which we justify our conduct are often
dumber than our actual conduct.
It is more tolerable to watch men live than to hear them
spout their opinions.
On with the quote of this guy.
From the book Two Arms and a Head. The Death of a Newly
Paraplegic Philosopher by Clayton Atreus, who, as he writes,
had many women in his life:
[…] Something else I’ve noticed is that in many ways we become what others
expect us to be. Marge Piercy perceived this when in her poem, “Barbie Doll”
the healthy young girl with fat legs and a big nose was “advised to play
coy” and “exhorted to come on hearty”. It’s an unforgettable poem. In
short, society in part dictates what personalities are available to others
based on much that has to do with the way they look. You may want to say
that this is shallow or cowardly or whatever but you’re just not thinking.
People just don’t respond the same to the ugly. Obese, dirty guys can’t get
away with the same behavior towards women as strong, beautiful ones can.
That’s just the way it is and will always be. […]
The truth, as always, hurts: genetics is destiny.
This stuff is also highly dysgenic and destructive to a civilization, so
of course those who hate the West, Christianity and white Europeans
are going to push this nonsense as hard as they can.
See also eugenics and
“female eugenics”.
Trying to play a character—being a psychopath, a shyster basically—is
something pretty repulsive to me anyway. Why would anyone do this?
It’s like “borrowing” expensive clothes and an expensive car to impress
women when in reality you are just lying, playing a role, driving in
cars you would never be able to buy. One would also attract women
one might not and should not attract.
It goes without saying that someone who follows MGTOW
and remains chaste is living a life closer to the Bible than
anyone adhering to the (false, untruthful, contradictory even)
“game”/“PUA” nonsense ever will.
A year ago or so, I made the mistake of watching some videos by
a user called George Bruno. Another shyster, and almost worse
than what I was already forced to endure! I vaguely remember him giving
away such nuggets of “wisdom”—for free!—like “decades fly by”
or “having children is the best use you can make of your sexual
organ” (he certainly used a different term) or “no one thinks of
me at night”.
The latter, of course, he said in a “manly” manner. That no one thinks
of him at night except the Lord, as he added, is no wonder, given that
he had more “ass than a toilet seat” (his vulgar choice of words) and
that he did not even manage to stay married—after all, he is such an alpha
women divorce him … He is a psychopath, like most of them. In civilized
times, he would have been thrown into a penitentiary—or hanged in public.
That “decades fly by” is nonsense, given that I hanged myself in my
early twenties; apparently, people kill themselves because decades
don’t “fly by”. I wish they did, because then my horrible
life I never asked for would be over. But I may have to endure
several decades more of this awful existence I never asked for
in the first place.
Regarding his claim that the best use you can make of your private
parts is having children, this is of course the usual nonsense we
already expect of the low IQ “PUA” imbeciles. No, there are many
who should not have children, no matter what idiots and uneducated
fools like
“koanic”
(Leo Joseph Buchignani) say.
Most of those guys teaching how to live life like a beast are feds
anyway. Chateau Heartiste/Roissy comes to mind. It may
be more prevalent in the US, which is already on the verge of collapse.
While marriage and the importance of wedlock has indeed declined,
I don’t know anyone where I live who lives life after such a rotten
worldview. Trash like tinder may have boosted it around here
as well. Either way, it is sign of a dying civilization. Nothting
to boast about, if you don’t want to be seen as a moron.
Beethoven never married. However, despite his poor social skills,
he fancied several women whom he taught to play the piano, who,
in turn, did fancy Beethoven, too. Though they usually were of
nobler, higher classes, therefore marriage was impossible.
Another reason this whole “hierarchy” nonsense is bound to
our decadent culture; Beethoven was not necessarily very
attractive either.
Wise men of the past, east and west, never would have taught to
copulate with as many women as possible.
Chesterton thought
so as well. All this sounds rather like a “philosophy”
a Genghis Khan
would approve of.
If we do have a soul that will be judged, then this kind
of lifestyle is actually leading to eternal damnation. And if it
is true—that we have an eternal soul, which is an article of faith—,
then such lifestyles are to be rejected anyway. Instead, one either
marries or remains single, there exists no gray area here.
I would without a doubt defend this view with my life, unlike
you weaklings who cannot even remain with a single woman.
NB. I have removed the three braces [((()))], seeing how all
this online Alt Right stuff
died.
Like Andy Nowicki, I am not much into such fads anyway, just wanted
to provoke back then.
Being a slave to lust is the worst way to spend your life.
More importantly, though, is the fact that not only does the Bible not
allow such a lifestyle — even the wise men of the past did not approve
of it, of course. Dixit Seneca:
“Among the worst offenders I count those who spend all their time in
drinking and lust, for these are the worst preoccupations of all. Other
people, even if they are possessed by an illusory semblance of glory,
suffer from a respectable delusion. You can give me a list of miserly
men, or hot-tempered men who indulge in unjust hatreds or wars: but
they are all sinning in a more manly way. It is those who are on a
headlong course of gluttony and lust who are stained with dishonour.”
While Vox Day and his friend
Giuseppe Filotto (The Kurgan) have to defend marriage as
Christians, they still try to paint their vulgar and hedonistic past
in a positive light. Boasting about their conquests, especially Filotto,
who, in one of his YouTube videos once rather proudly said he had “[…]
forty women in two years“. FIlotto also claimed that Jay Dyer
is repugnant to the other sex, even though he knew how unchristian
such a sentence is, wherefore he added (I paraphrase) that he is not
saying that having had sexual relations with many women is—his choice of
word!—necessarily a good thing.
Well, I would say such a deranged life is nothing to emulate, basically
just a waste of time; Seneca agrees, not to mention the Bible.
There is no reason to believe that the internet is full of wise people
anyway. It is wasting a lot of time, and one usually leaves being worse
off mentally.
In a four hour
interview
with Curt Jaimungal titled Chris Langan on IQ, The Singularity,
Free Will, Psychedelics, CTMU, and God Theories of Everything, Chris
Langan says (around 02:08:50) that he was single most of his life until
he was almost fifty years old. Yet, Langan gets ignored by guys like
Vox Day, maybe because
they are afraid of him – the interviewer even said he was!
This lifestyle was not possible in the past anyway, it is the result
of obscene wealth that makes it possible; this wealth was achieved
through intelligence, dedication, discipline, hard work, monogamy.
Otherwise, who would be able to live such wretched, deranged lives
where their genitalia is their god when the streets are full of
excrements, the mortality rates are high, people become sick more
easily, running, fresh water does not exist, and you have to work
on the fields most of the time?
You would not be able to, apart from the fact that if people got
wind of your reckless, promiscuous behaviour, harsh punishment
would follow — except for the nobility, maybe.
So in the end, all those guys like Roosh V., Krauser PUA,
Chateau Heartiste were either feds or simply deranged, psychopathic
men of low, crude taste and character. Not that gifted, not that smart,
not that educated either.
What Paul Fussel called prole drift. Why listen to such
men, and not those of high moral character? Because we are going downhill,
we are living during times of decadence and degeneration.
Back when I was checking out videos on YouTube—an awful platform,
especially the comments—, I remember seeing the video of a
MGTOW; his username was LRS or
LRA, I think. The title of the video was something along
the lines of PUA vs. MGTOW or so.
In it, he even admitted—I paraphrase as best as I can—that it may be
fun for a night, but the next day you are going to regret it anyway.
Adding that you won’t get a price for living such a life (“hooking up”
with lots of “hot” women, that is.)
He lived such a deranged life himself to an extent. This is all I
remember, apart from a rather limited “hierarchy” of status he
presented, where height was almost the most important.
I don’t think so. However, maybe it is indeed. One reason tall men get
promoted often is because they are tall, not because they are more
intelligent.
As an aside, “alpha males” like Rollo Tomassi,
Vox Day, Roosh V.,
Chateau Heartiste / Roissy (no idea if he even exists, most
likely a fed) – such men are just talking into their cameras or sitting
in front of their computers. Nothing supposed alphas would occupy
themselves much with.
Above I mentioned George Bruno, who claimed
to have had more—and I quote—“ass than a toilet seat”. I also
remember hearing him say that when he goes to bed at night, there is no
one who thinks of him, except the Lord. He is divorced despite seeing
himself as some kind of alpha, I guess. I have
made fun of this before.
Regarding his claim that there is no one who thinks of him at night,
it is no wonder, given that he boasts about his “conquests”, which
are only possible if you’re a
psychopath.
He also lectures people for being pessmistic or downtrodden, when it’s no
wonder many people are depressed who have to live in the pigsty he helped
create.
As Gómez Dávila, married with three children to a wife that has
been said to have been a beauty, wrote:
The soul is man’s task.
A decent man is one who makes demands upon himself that the
circumstances do not make upon him.
Men can be divided into those who make their life complicated to
gain their soul and those who waste their soul to make their life easier.
In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in
corrupting.
Sins that appear “splendid” from afar are from close up
nothing more than small sordid episodes.
Sexual promiscuity is the tip society pays in order to appease its
slaves.
A ridiculous sense of shame will not allow the intelligent writer today
to deal with anything but obscene topics.
But since he learned not to be ashamed of anything, he should not be ashamed
of decent sentiments.
Modern society is abolishing prostitution through promiscuity.
Humanity is not cured of its diseases except by means
of catastrophes that decimate it.
Man has never known how to renounce at the right time.
To liberate man is to subject him to greed and sex.
Sex does not solve even sexual problems.
Progress in the end comes down to stealing from man what ennobles
him, in order to sell to him at a cheap price what degrades him.
Whoever abandons himself to his instincts degrades his face as
obviously as he degrades his soul.
Let us be careful not to call accepting what degrades us without
any resistance “accepting life.”
That which impersonalizes degrades.
Reading the newspaper degrades whomever it does not make into a brute.
The modern world demands that we approve what it should not even dare
ask us to tolerate.
When the modern consciousness suspends its economic routines, it only
oscillates between political anguish and sexual obsession.
The 19th century did not live with more anguish because of its sexual
repression than the 20th century with its sexual liberation.
Identical obsession, even when the symptoms are the opposite.
The problem is not sexual repression, nor sexual liberation, but sex.
It is impossible to convince the fool that there are pleasures superior
to those we share with the rest of the animals.