Giuseppe Filotto aka The Kurgan (…) is an obscene degenerate.

One of the many degenerate friends of Vox Day, just like Roosh V., Milo Yiannopoulos, Mike Cernovich and I don’t even want to know what other kind of morally degenerate men he associates with.

He boasted, in one of his videos on YouTube I made the mistake of accessing several years ago now, that he had forty women in two years, or that he copulated with women of whom he did not even know the name … That he had sexual intercourse with women even if he did not have anything in common with them, just because he could not restrain himself. He wrote about this in his horrible ebook about how he became a Catholic. I don’t even want to know what kind of women he met, as he himself wrote something along the lines of “… you could say they had loose morals”. Yes, rather trashy.

His third wife apparently was too smart for her previous boyfriends—I wonder if she’s even Catholic …—, he of course can handle her, with his IQ of 155. No joke. He claimed his IQ to be higher than Vox Day’s. Most likely a lie. Further, I have quoted Nils M. Holm several times on these pages. Says Holm:

[…] What is more likely for a person in the above-3σ range is a life full of hurdles, misunderstandings, anxiety, depression, and marginalization. The more removed from the average, the more likely a person will fail to find their place in society. […]

[…]

[…] Note that not much is said here about very successful people with a 3σ or higher IQ. This is not because they do not exist, but because they are the exception to the rule, and the greater the distance from the average the greater the exception. […]

While this does not need to be the case for all with IQs above a certain level, 145+ in this case, it is almost comical that they all want to have 150+ IQs and are also highly successful in almost all areas of life, especially women and money, which is where one least suspects people with high intelligence to excel or even want to excel at!

For not only is there a smaller amount of women with such high IQs anyway – I remember reading that for one gifted girl, there are about seven or eight (I forgot) gifted boys. This makes it even harder to find someone one gets along with, and for a Christian, one ought to marry in the Lord, making things even more complicated in this day and age.

Chris Langan has an IQ of around 195-210 and was lonely most of his life, married only after he was almost fifty years old.

What’s worse, Filotto claimed that whenever he needed more money, he simply earned more! I quote this from memory, but this is basically what he said. Yet, the higher your intelligence, the less likely to have much success in life. Not only the quote by Holm agrees here, but Chris Langan’s life itself: he worked odd jobs, mostly as a bouncer and earned around 10.000 dollars a year. He rejects the view that IQ and wealth correlate positively, too.

What else do you expect? Most brilliant geniuses, to take the extreme, were occupied not with sex and money, but with intellectual endeavors.

However, “what you need to understand”—to make use of an over-used phrase by his friend Vox Day—I don’t care about life and only live because I was born. The Bible does not teach to like life, we even ought to hate it. There is no reason to think otherwise, the mechanics that bring us into the world are disgusting and a curse.

I would not have chosen this existence, I am glad when I’m dead. The “funny”—or rather not-so-funny—bit is that Vox Day once said the Boomers were the first generation who had latchkey children in other states, implying that latchkey children already existed among the so-called Greatest Generation.

However, his friend Filotto even has a child on another continent – because he is so “alpha”, he got divorced by his wife who now lives in Brazil with his daughter, while he lives in Great Britain! This was his second wife already, as far as I know, not counting his many other degenerate “encounters” with women. Even an atheist like Wilmot Robertson was closer to Christ with his views.

After he became Catholic, he married yet again, of course, though this time in the Lord, as he added. He also boasted how his wife’s sisters were in awe or shock or so when he ordered her to get him a drink. Yawn. He went on to have two more children at least, at age 46 or older, I guess. OK.

He was born in 1969 and had a Damascus experience in 2013, converted to a Catholic sect in May 2018 or so, and then took on Jay Dyer in a debate in December 2019 already. The arrogance of this man!

Of course he did not hand him his head, as Vox Day ridiculously claimed prior to this debacl… debate, but was crushed by Jay Dyer, and I don’t even like him much. While not his fault, Filotto’s voice is simply not suited for this kind of format. Almost as horrible as Kenneth Brown’s.

He even republished, after apparently being a Christian now, his stupid book about some kind of face on Mars …! He did not really reject his past views regarding reincarnation either. During the debate with Jay Dyer, he almost defended it still. Filotto is a quack who believed and most likely still believes in all kinds of utterly ridiculous trash.

I have not, nor do I want to read his book about the Catholic Church. I guess it is just as awful if not more so as everything I have read and heard from this guy. I will quote a review from Amazon.com, though, which already gives a clue on what to expect:

Anonymous

1.0 out of 5 stars

Insufferable Read

Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2021
Verified Purchase

529 pg book was difficult to read. In addition to the shoddy scholarship and poor reference & citation inclusion, what made it so difficult is that Filotto’s grammar, sentence structure, tirades, and overall style is atrocious. To give you an idea of what the book sounds like here’s a sample. On page 392 Filotto wrote:

“But you will also note that wormtongue Salza doesn’t want you or me to DEMAND something of those ambiguous fakers who perhaps have tried to continue to pretend to be actual Catholics by perhaps never referring to Vatican II and possibly not mentioning Bergolio as Pope ever when doing their Mass and maybe ONLY doing the Latin Mass (which is valid, unlike the fake Novus Orco Mass).”

Imagine an entire book of that! I’ll give you one more. On page 357 Filotto wrote:

“Jay reads a lot of theology books. And then makes a big deal of this fact and his ignorant followers fawn at his knowledge. There are only a little couple of problems. While Jay might read a lot of these books, he certainly doesn’t seem to grasp their essence very well, and secondly, he absolutely misrepresents their contents to suit his agenda of the day and this can and has changed over time with the result that various people have made videos of these about-faces of his various positions.”

Reading Filotto’s adolescent insulting rants was insufferable to me and yet I managed to complete the entire book. Even his subtitle “The True History of Vatican II and the Visible Remnant of the Real Catholic Church now that the Vatican is a Pederast Infested Hive of Impostors” is a long-winded rant. This book should be read with a bucket close by because readers will get dizzy trying to follow Filotto’s spastic run-on mind. He more or less admits it on page 374:

“I get it, my punctilious, obsessively-compulsive, geeky, I want-all-the-details, Asperger-suffering, slightly autistic friends. Truly I do. For I am one of you myself in certain instances, and it is always good to investigate things yourself.”

Moving on to the substance of Filotto’s book, it offers nothing new to Traditional Catholicism. Just about everything Filotto brings to the table (in convoluted disorder) was already written decades ago by competent authors - who actually edited their work. Those interested in learning about Sedevacantism and the history of the Church which led to this position should not waste their money. A far better book is the Radeckis’ Tumultuous Times. Also, anything by Fr. Anthony Cekada.

Filotto writes a lot of nonsense that indicates he did not invest the time to know the material. For example, on page 125 he states that Eastern Orthodoxy denies that the pope of Rome was considered “First among equals:” He wrote:

“Often confused and conflated with papal infallibility all that Papal Supremacy means is that the Pontiff of Rome was always considered first among equals. The Eastern Orthodox will rail and shout against that sentence, but vainly and invalidly so… The smarter, or perhaps better read “Orthodox” do not deny this because literally it’s scattered all over the patristic writings and various councils, as I said, accepted by all present at the time as a simple and true fact.”

This is not just a mistake; it’s author negligence, especially because some of his insulting rants in this very book are against people who know well the main issues dividing Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. As any knowledgeable Catholic or Orthodox Christian knows, “first among equals” has never been the dividing issue. Orthodox Christians reject the pope’s universal jurisdiction (i.e. supremacy over the whole Church). That Filotto doesn’t understand “first among equals” is embarrassing. But it gets worse, much worse, because Filotto goes on to “define” “First Among Equals” on pages 125-127. HINT: Filotto has no idea what he is talking about.

The above is only a small sample. There are too many problems with this book to fit into this review but hopefully I made my point. I’ll finish it with this. On page 243, Filotto (whose book is about the true history of Vatican II that led to Sedeprviationism) wrote:

“I will reproduce the work done by Benjamin Frederick Dryden, with the blessing of Daniel Dolan who at the time it was written was a priest and is now a Bishop in the Catholic CMRI (Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen).”

The problem is that Bishop Daniel Dolan does not belong to the CMRI and nor did he ever belong to the CMRI. Bishop Daniel Dolan’s organization is St. Gertrude the Great (SGG) based in Cincinnati, OH. To understand the significance of Filotto’s error, I’ll just summarize a few important facts about Bp Daniel Dolan that made him an extremely important historical figure in the Sedevacantist movement. He was ordained by the famous traditionalist Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in in Econe Swizerland in 1976. Upon his return to the Unites in 1977 he went on to establish 35 traditionalist Mass centers and became one of the famous "nine" expelled from Archbishop Lefebvre’s traditionalist society (SSPX) for holding the Sedevacantist positon. Bp Dolan still serves Sedevacantist communities in the US, Mexico, Brazil and Europe. The fact that Filotto does not know about Bp Dolan is a warning to readers of what they should expect out of this book. Unless directly quoting an authority, everything Filotto writes should be suspect and checked for accuracy. He’s grossly unqualified. He would do well to stay within the area of his claimed expertise, Hypnotism, and leave theology and Catholic history alone.

16 people found this helpful

I’d say that someone who has lived such a horribly deranged life should enter a monastery and keep his mouth shut until his death. Yet, after such a train wreck of a life, this imbecile now wants to play theologian, too!

As usual, I’ll end quoting a real Catholic, a man of taste and good breeding, who did not waste his life living promiscuously, but learned seven languages instead, including Latin and Greek, apart from the vast amount of books he read: Gómez Dávila:

Modern man has no interior life: hardly even internal conflicts.

It is above all against what the crowd proclaims to be “natural” that the noble soul rebels.

The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.

Men can be divided into those who make their life complicated to gain their soul and those who waste their soul to make their life easier.

In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in corrupting.

It is not worth talking about even one erotic topic with someone who does not feel the unalterable baseness of erotism.

The majority of men have no right to give their opinion, but only to listen.

It is fine to demand that the imbecile respect arts, letters, philosophy, the sciences, but let him respect them in silence.

Christianity, when it abolishes its ancient liturgical languages, degenerates in to strange, uncouth sects.
Once contact is broken with Greek and Latin antiquity, once its medieval and pat ristic inheritance is lost, any simpleton turns into its exegete.

We should ask the majority of people not to be sincere, but mute.