[Topics]
“Unmarried men want civilization dead”
Written: 2019-10-15
Addition: 2019-10-18
For the umpteenth time: no, no and no again. In my late teens and
early twenties, the only thing I was interested in was truth and
becoming a genius. My hero was mostly Schopenhauer, whom I wanted to
emulate – the “Privatgelehrtenexistenz” appealed greatly to me, and it
still does, though I have come to appreciate
Gómez Dávila more
in recent years, especially now that I am a Christian. (“Truth”
as in the meaning of this mostly awful existence I found myself
forced into; or “geworfen”, as Heidegger phrases it.)
I had absolutely no interest in women, and even found the idea of
relationships or marrying to be obscene and ridiculous. Andy Nowicki,
who married, seems to be the only contemporary so far who had a similar
outlook when young. I also saw sex as degrading, similar to how
Schopenhauer describes it – as a Christian I hold to this view even
more strongly now.
Further, there are families today who support all the destructive
policies that will bring an end to the Western world, who are
in favor of pornography, sexual promiscuity, immigration,
same-sex “marriage”, gender studies and what other kind of
vulgarities people lust after these days. Whereas I—someone
who is complete trash, an ugly hunchback, part of the
dregs of society and so on—don’t.
And it’s game over from an early age anyway once you understand
that you are different from most people, that you are mentally
ill and will suffer to the end. Except if you kill yourself – a
choice I no longer have as a Christian, having to suffer through
this life like the Catholic Reinhold Schneider.
(Pascal and Kierkegaard, maybe even Jerome come to mind as well.)
I am certain that modern Christians would burn someone like St.
Augustine at the stake for his remarks in
De bono coniugali
and
De bono viduitatis,
even though Aquinas—for whom Augustine was an authority—similarly
places celibacy above marriage (see also
Christianity and procreation above.)
The german edition of St. Jerome’s letters even includes rather harsh
(and inane) comments of the editor(s) about Jerome’s views on marriage.
To get to the point of the subject: no, apart from holy men like
Augustine, Jerome or Aquinas themselves, there were dozens of unmarried
men in the West who did not destroy it—except if one stretches the
definition of what “destroy” means. (Like saying that of course a Tesla
or Newton should have had children – but why, given that we know that
geniuses usually don’t beget geniuses? Eduard Einstein was mentally ill.)
Case in point, Jacob Burckhardt never married and was a great learned
man, a kind of genius for sure.
(As I wrote above:
23% of men and women between ages 40-44 remained unmarried at the end of the 17th century.)
Just stop it. I respond here to a comment by a certain “Rolf” on Vox Day’s
blog (Rolf Nelson?). It is not true, and “tz” errs as well by writing
that marrying your cousins will destroy your DNA. It is nonsense, as the
post above shows. Japan is inbred, and capable, but nepotistic: a boon
in today’s world.
As I have written elsewhere on these pages: I’m an ugly hunchback,
mentally ill, a loser who started to feel different from most people
in his youth. The chaos, though, already began in grammar school,
first grade: I did not want to attend it, and later dropped out during
9th grade. I find life to be a pretty awful experience and decided early
on that I had to kill myself and never even thought about passing on this
crap that was forced onto me. Genetics is destiny, you reckless
imbeciles. (And my parents aren’t cousins.)
My physical illnesses are already bad enough, but mental illness tops them
easily. It is truly one of the worst sicknesses you can pass on to a child.
To be fair, though, I have to take my hat off to dc.sunsets
for rightly calling out the Heartistian vulgarity that is praised so
much on the right – the very vulgarity that currently destroys our
civilization. But only for this, his praising of his sons and so on
is besides the point, for if you are an ugly hunchback, you will
never be “attractive” to women and whatever nonsense you guys
constantly have on your mind. If people weren’t lured into
sex, if it weren’t such a ridiculously strong drive—Schopenhauer
emphasizes this very often, especially in his “Metaphysics of Sexual
Love”—then humanity would have died out long ago.
The main theme of these pages actually is
eugenics, for life is awful enough –
don’t then force people like me with awful genetics into existence.
Kevin MacDonald’s article
Monogamy and the Uniqueness of European Civilization
links to another article by Jonah Goldberg, titled
The Wisdom of Dan Quayle,
wherein Quayle is quoted as saying:
[…]
Quayle mentioned “Murphy Brown” once. “Bearing babies irresponsibly
is simply wrong. Failing to support children one has fathered is
wrong, and we must be unequivocal about this. It doesn’t help matters
when prime-time TV has Murphy Brown, a character who supposedly
epitomizes today’s intelligent, highly paid, professional woman,
mocking the importance of fathers by bearing a child alone and
calling it just another lifestyle choice. I know it is not fashionable
to talk about moral values, but … it’s time to make the discussion
public.”
(See also the article by Harold Blake Walker
[mentioned above]:
Right to life is great, but not for the unwanted.)
Says Schopenhauer in his “Nachlass”:
Schopenhauer on horniness
Das fortwährende Daseyn des Menschengeschlechts ist bloß ein Beweis
der Geilheit desselben.
(Loosely translated: “The perpetual existence of mankind merely is
proof for its horniness.”
MPAI (“Most People Are Idiots”)? Maybe. But even more so
MPAU, MPAS and MPAV:
Most People Are Uneducated, Most People Are Shallow
and Most People Are Vulgar, respectively – often obscenely
so, unfortunately.
Topping it all off by quoting Gómez Dávila:
The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.
Depopulate and reforest – first civilizing rule.
In a perfect penal code, vulgarity would be punished
with the death penalty.
Wisdom, in this century, consists above all in knowing how
to put up with vulgarity without becoming upset.
Of the book of the world, we know nothing but pages
written in a language we do not understand.
Only he lives his life who observes it, thinks it,
and says it; the rest let life live them.