Emil O. W. Kirkegaard – yet another sex-obsessed imbecile.

I came across him, like most others, because of my interest in physical anthropology and IQ research. It seems that what people call the Alternative Right—apparently overlapping somewhat with those guys dabbling with IQ data—is full of sex-crazed morons who do not even know Latin fluently. Not to mention the fact that being against marriage and instead favoring what they call “polyarmory” (downright fornication) is everything but part of the political “Right”.

He is deeply in love with himself, regards himself as a “philosopher”, a “polymath”, is a vocal atheist (i.e. a moron). On his archived OKCupid profile, he, a typcial narcisssist if not psychopath, wrote:

I’m really good at

Very fast reading. I read >40 books this year so far. I have compared myself with other people at a similar intelligence level, and I read much faster than them. Lots of practice. :)

Remembering stuff from reading it years ago.

Formalizing arguments. Clear and sharp thinking.

Puns. Especially lame and bad ones.

Being an asshole. (A mild case of Gregory House)

[…]

Favorite books, movies, shows, music, and food

Books. Lots. I made a profile at Goodreads. Currently at 200ish nonfiction books not including pre-high school school books. I don’t generally read fiction, but when I do, it’s usually sci-fi (say, something like Heinlein’s Time Enough for Love) or meta-humor (Happiness was very funny!).

[…]

Music. In short, a lot of different stuff, but especially old rock music (think Pink Floyd and Rolling Stones) and modern electronic music (dubstep, tech house, minimal), and lots of instrumental music (because it is good for reading, lyrics interferes with my concentration).

As someone else wrote, it is of little importance whether one has similar tastes in film and music. Books, probably pretty important. Although I can live with people that read fiction. :P

While this is several years old, I would never have supported such deranged dung he calls “polyarmory”. He also reads sci-fi, which is exactly what I would expect from such a crude rude brute like Kirkegaard.

He is unable to appreciate Søren Kierkegaard’s depth and wit, instead thinking of himself so highly it is almost comical given that he has nothing to show for. Further, he rejects a classical education, denigrates fiction—which would include the Canon—and does not even have any classical composers listed.

I wouldn’t care if these guys weren’t always so arrogant. He is one of those who puff themselves up beyond measure, yet he doesn’t even aspire to educate himself. Such guys are fine with their vulgar tastes.

But why, then, feel so important? You are a joke.

Spengler would have his field day if he were still alive, seeing how he despised such people to the bone.

Further, still from his OKCupid profile, showing how degenerate he is he wrote:

polyamory is a plus. It will never work in a long-term sexual exclusive relationship (as in, I will cheat sooner or later). There are too many nice women for that to work. I like variety. :)

It’s called decadence, not polyarmory, which is a word invented by someone not fluent in Latin and Greek. It is the downfall of a society, as not only Spengler wrote, but J. D. Unwin in his Sex and Culture. Eric S. Raymond is another creep in favor of such degeneracy.

I hope you choke to death on your lust. It also proves that he is most likely a psychopath, as I have written before.

While I don’t take seriously trashy sites like kiwifarms or, in this case, rationalwiki, what they quoted there regarding pornography is pretty disgusting. Kirkegaard is in favor of such stuff. I don’t believe he is a pedophile, just a typical degenerate, which is bad enough.

Pornography, as E. Michael Jones wrote in Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, is actually fueling rape and other such phantasies.

What people ought to be taught, instead, is chastity. Pornography, as well as contraception should be banned, outlawed completely. No one needs this trash, it has to go. Life is awful enough, which is something all great men agreed upon, as Spengler himself wrote in his last notes “Politica”.

You guys are just effeminate weaklings in love with a hedonistic lifestyle, you are afraid of death because of your atheism. Though even when I was an atheist, I hanged myself; Kirkegaard would use this against me, writing that I’m mentally ill. Who cares? Not that I’m a genius, though most brilliant men had mental issues.

It’s over. You guys are just mediocre Duff beer drinking, Beretta-shooting skirtchasers.

His jokes regarding virgins are juvenile; those who attack him online (…!) are people who can’t get any … linking to an urbandictionary page regarding coping.

This guy is not a scientist of any kind, he just dabbles in it like we all do. Immature on top, he can hardly be taken seriously. While I don’t care much about credentials, a BA in linguistics is basically nothing compared to attending a monastic or Latin school. Apart from the fact that I did not find his IQ score either.

As I mentioned above, he also rejects Kierkegaard—due to the similarity of his name, he has a page about him—calling him mentally ill or so. Yes, as I already pointed out numerous times: most brilliant men aren’t idiotic gun-loving fanatics or sex-obsessed imbeciles.

If he actually read books, real books, he’d know this. However, he is too busy having promiscuous sex while lamenting the downfall of the West or so, even though his behaviour is reason for it,

I have already linked to Nils M. Holm; further mentioned that Christopher Langan, who has an IQ of 195-210, was single most of his life until he married when he was almost fifty years old.

Shall we put vermin like my father on a pedestal because he had “it”, with “it” being something that almost anybody is capable of? You imbecile!

The reason many of those active in—for lack of a better term—the IQ research field are so hateful and snarky is that they are jealous of the greats – as am I, though I don’t denigrate them for it. I have to accept that my life is horrible, while the Kirkegaards are lying to themselves.

Nicolás Gómez Dávila was spared this circus, thankfully:

One could object to science that it easily falls into the hands of imbeciles, if religion’s case were not just as serious.

The modern world demands that we approve what it should not even dare ask us to tolerate.

Every burden soon oppresses us, if we do not have Jesus as our Cyrenean.

The taste of the masses is characterized not by their antipathy to the excellent, but by the passivity with which they enjoy equally the good, the mediocre, and the bad.
The masses do not have bad taste. They simply do not have taste.

It is fine to demand that the imbecile respect arts, letters, philosophy, the sciences, but let him respect them in silence.

The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.

The individual who lies to himself, just like the society that does not lie to itself, soon rots and dies.

The only antidote to envy, in vulgar souls, is the conceit of believing that they have nothing to envy.

To appreciate the ancient or the modern is easy; but to appreciate the obsolete is the triumph of authentic taste.

Modern man calls his ambition a duty.

It is acceptable to disdain a great man if in turn one is not admiring a mediocre one.