koanic / Leo Littlebook is another reason the internet was a mistake.

I remember reading his over-the-top comments on Vox Day’s blog. On another one by some guy called Jim—a blog about sex, which is what this guy is obsessed with—, he even got lectured by the imbecile hosting it, writing that, I am paraphrasing, we have heard enough times how smart you are, stop it. koanic wrote something regarding the apostle Peter and how high his own IQ is (three+ sigma or so.)

Now, I found some horrible writings of this guy.

He himself cites others in his document, even a deranged Swede who had children with Gypsy and Albanian women. Very vulgar.

I have read some of it and could not believe how awful this guy’s thinking is, and how uneducated for someone claiming to be so smart. His sources are blog posts, news sites, reddit, 4chan, YouTube, Quora even! and so on. Ridiculous.

From some long document about current events:

There are several ways a Great Harvest can play out. The best one (for us) is if the planet peacefully unites and Ascends without casualties, presenting a unified front to the galaxy. This is a common outcome, but it will not happen for us. […] Weakening, crippling and killing the masses has long been their control strategy; this is merely an escalation from millions to billions.

No idea what he means with Great Harvest, as if he has some secret knowledge; who cares about the galaxy? What is this, did he play too many video games? He does indeed waste a lot of time playing roguelike video games. Time he could better spent reading books or learning Latin and Greek. Education is not important to him.

He buys into the depopulation agenda. Currently, eight billion people exist, the Western world never had more inhabitants, even if you remove migrants. Further, people are using contraception and abortion themselves; at best one could say that media propaganda is fueling use of it, which does not mean, though, that one has to use it.

Also, no need to cripple me artificially, I was born hunchbacked and mentally ill because you allow genetic dung to have children.

Living a promiscuous life, as Koanic/Leo Littlebook did himself despite being a protestant Christian, as well as not having children is a choice people take. Given his lifestyle, it is questionable if Leo Littlebook is Christian at all; he seems more like a false teacher who preaches deranged views with the goal to demoralise us. Not much different from the corrupt and decadent media outlets!

After all, he even tried to sell some kind of PUA dung! Called his game nonsense KoanicSoul or so. With which he only showed what kind of lemming he is. Hardly someone who could be called an original thinker.

After all, in another document, he writes:

Previously the right bred primarily via religion. The postmodern left has developed effective counters to this strategy, as 2,000-year-old Christianity fades into obsolescence, overwhelmed by scientific advancement.

Now high-IQ rightists have adopted a breeding strategy that relies not on myth but objective genetics. Nothing can stop them from inheriting the Earth. Unlike Christianity, kin-breeding is inherently resistant to immivasion.

He seems to be historically-challenged, otherwise he would know that Christendom defended itself against immigration. We lack faith, this is why we are in this situation. Calling God myth and asserting that scientific advancement overwhelmed Christ does not leave much room for believing that he is a Christian. He also uses a saying by Christ in a profane manner: obviously, Christ never meant that inherting the earth meant ruling earthly kingdoms.

Worse, this Leo Littlebook guy does not seem meek at all, rather arrogant and not someone with a good education; he may have some axe to grind, given that in a comment he once denigrated someone versed in Latin and Greek as having learnt dead languages. An insult only stupid people would make. Yet he gets off on telling others how smart he is. Imagine the internet would not exist! He’d go insane! He needs it to puff himself up.

Fitting escolio by Don Colacho:

Someone who did not learn Latin and Greek goes through life convinced, even though he may deny it, that he is only semi-cultured.

He goes on and takes Edward Dutton seriously! Quote:

This video by illustrious evolutionary psychologist Edward Dutton, published in Jan 2021, yielded 31k views without controversy.

Who cares? Evolutionary psychology is quackery, is not science at all. Dutton did not even study any of this — “illustrious”?! Koanic is a fool. Dutton studied theology and has a PhD in religious studies. You cannot be serious. The amount of views are irrelevant anyway. As if numbers determine truth. Why cite a video? Is this what smart people do?

In later quotes, one gets the impression that Leo Littlebook spends too much time online, taking online content at face value. How many books did he read? Reminds me of another shyster who hated reading and was insufferable in a similar fashion. At least he knew German.

He doubles down, as always:

Remain celibate to save the environment. Tinder, video games, porn and abortion are cool and normal.

Again, unchristian, showing he does not follow the Bible despite his claim of being a Christian. Christ taught celibacy himself, even someone like William MacDonald agrees here.

Celibacy is a commitment that most, unfortunately, do not choose. What he means is chastity. Making fun of it is everything but Christian; you also do not decide who has value and who does not. God does.

Further, reading books will also occupy you, would you ban them as well? Better yet, people who play video games have children, too; or those who use tinder and porn and abortion. What is his point? That his rhetoric is awful? Having sexual intercourse is not a great feat, people will always act on their base desires, as the Bible teaches, and even today, despite falling birth rates, children still are getting born.

Including me, who is suffering from having to exist. Especially among such nightmarish creatures as koanic/Leo Littlebook.

Why would I want to exist anyway? What do I gain by having children? My genetics are awful, his are too, as I remember seeing an archived YouTube video of him from around 2012, where he talked about being in pain and having to eat food from the deep sea or so, it needs to be really fresh and clean or whatever. If this is true, why pass this on? Sounds rather horrible and not as if he is healthy.

In a blog post about an interview with Christopher Langan, I read a comment by a user Billco, with an IQ in the mid-150’s, who wrote:

Today’s world is an idiocracy; people care not about where we’ll be in 10 or 100 years, they care about satisfying their petty animal needs here and now. The great majority of people of this earth will leave no legacy whatsoever, aside from a mountain of debt and generation after generation of aimless amoebic children, parasites to their own kind.

Rather harsh but quite true. At least once children have grown up, many will most likely live like that. For example, by becoming PUAs. Leo Littlebook, obviously, would say his children will be totally different, he has it all under control, even any illnesses he rooted out, not possible with his genetics which are cream of the crop. As if we choose our genes …

He also made the claim in one of his horrid essays that more love means more sex, which suggests that his existence is indeed rather amoebic. Nothing else going on in your life? I suspect he is very lazy and therefore does not have any real skills, does not even know Latin! Calling it a dead language.

What I found laughable was his claim right at the beginning:

3rd-cousin marriage results in 21% more children and 25% more grandchildren, regardless of who the children marry. That is a huge effect, almost certainly caused by better genetic health, not just a stronger social network.

First off, his source is Dutton. Even if we take this weirdo seriously, it does matter who you marry. Though the study he mentioned is from Iceland, so there is not as much diversity, which is why the way he phrased it is rather insincere. Not very representative!

As if sheer numbers are to be sought after. Not sure if they really existed, but one example of a family with a long history of socially undesirable progeny were the Jukes family as well as the Kallikaks, the latter being a madeup word from the Greek, meaning good/bad. Is this what he wants? In the end, you will have been responsible for generations of mentally ill people who may even commit suicide and be damned for all eternity!

Further, better genetic health: certainly not, especially not in our times, where less than one percent of a generation die during childhood. Arabs are highly inbred, they have large families. And I am not even arguing against cousin marriage itself, just his claims about it. Which really are Dutton’s, he just rehashes all this.

Further nonsense:

There will always be people who question whether the sky is blue, but their objections are irrelevant. The Iceland study demonstrates that the increase in children is even stronger for grandchildren. The effect is multi-generational, regardless of who the children marry. This implies increased overall thriving. It doesn’t matter whether the thriving is attributed to happiness, social support, health, or whatever.

Quiet now, imbecile. Taking a single study as gospel truth while bragging about how intelligent you are is worse than murder. Writing a sentence like [t]his implies increased overall thriving is vulgar.

Happiness is not an objective standard, it is a highly subjective measurement and not important anyway. Most geniuses were not happy, yet they achieved great results in their undertakings. Even Christ does not promise a happy life, most monks are rather sober people. It is also hardly possible to improve upon old European history. Where are Iceland’s Beethovens? Goethes? Shakespeares? Rembrandts? Idiot.

You look even stupider for thinking that debating and arguing achieves anything. Leo Littlebook most likely has little clue about politics, political theory and so on. Instead of surfing the web, he should rather read books instead. Pretty ridiculous that he calls someone else an “unlettered bigot” given his own deficiencies.

Further down, he comments upon what others wrote in response:

> Perhaps a blood clan would be ideal, from my perspective this comes with it’s own tribal disadvantages.

Some prefer to remain celibate. Natural selection is eugenic.

Just more polemic, in his typically arrogant and obnoxious style. Some of the greatest geniuses like Beethoven, Kant, Kierkegaard, Pascal, Nietzsche, van Gogh had no children, yet they were gifted beyond measure. More so than this guy will ever be. You are just envious.

Further, mean IQs are dropping, it does not seem to be the case that the smartest are having children, and the smartest do not need to be the healthiest either. Chris Langan was single most of his life, meeting his wife when he was almost fifty.

Nils M. Holm, member of the Triple Nine Society, wrote about people with IQs 3.5 to 5 standard deviations above the mean who struggle in life, are alone, suicidal; who have failed in life.

IQs above 145 may rather be detrimental to living in our society today. Holm correctly writes that there has to be more to a relationship—he is not a Christian, I would use the term marriage—than sheer lust. However, a psychopath like koanic would not care, I guess; he may even kill or abandon his wife and children. Christopher Langan also rightly called into question the view that having a high IQ means that one’s salary is high as well.

Natural selection does not exist anyway, it is a fable that men who have ego issues tell themselves. They think that having children makes them better than others, which is false, as the Bible teaches. There are men who have children and do not care about them, which means they could just as well be dead; why would passing on genes for asocial, psychopathic behaviour be a good thing? Yet this is what koanic/Leo Littlebook as well as many others who bow before sex-crazed PUAs put on a pedestal.

Especially in our times, natural selection seems absolutely laughable. Vox Day does not buy into it either. Interestingly enough, Andy Nowicki, one of the few of the Alt-Right who has reached some philosophical depth due to his anti-sex outlook, unfortunately does believe in this depopulation nonsense as well, though he does not denigrate others who are alone, do not have children and so on.

Another baseless claim koanic/Leo Littlebook makes:

Even if 3rd cousin marriage were no longer viable for 3rd-generation practitioners, those grandchildren will beg in courting 40 years from now, by which time genetics will have advanced to the point that this crude approximation of optimal eugenics will be obsolete regardless.

What does that even mean? You have no idea how society will look like in forty years; genetics? To modify our DNA, to water it down will most likely end in a disaster. Genetics is the answer of a weakling who is unwilling to forbid certain people to have children because of being a sex-obsessed coward. (He even repeats this genetics will have advanced magic spell a second time.)

He seems to confess to denying the Bible, which means he really is a false prophet/false teacher the Bible warns us Christians about; it also explains why he puts way too much importance on the physical aspects of life, like sexuality:

They always call me whatever they hate, and they’re always right:

- Hick: Confederate Texan bluegrass fan
- Nazi: Germanic Wehrmacht grognard
- Jew: 1/8 Ashkenazi Christian
- Heretic: Bible denier
- Incel: On all levels except physical, I am incel.

Bible denier, right there from the horse’s mouth! That he thinks it important to tell us that he is sex-obsessed … okay, just proves my point. As if having sexual intercourse is such an achievement, hardly anyone ever succeeded in it …! Even my father, this piece of trash, did, you idiot.

Hick: wow, he is not at all ashamed of being prole, he affirms it, as if this is something to be proud of, whereas in the past, people at least tried to behave better because our society was still influenced by those of good breeding. Times that are long gone. This is what Paul Fussell called prole drift.

He also does not understand what the German Wehrmacht was, which makes sense given how uneducated he is.

Ironic that he thinks he is saving anything, yet he lacks manners already!

I could stop now, given that he admits denying the veracity of the Bible. Still, in yet another document, he writes, and I am not joking!:

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, because the beauty of the Aryan woman must not perish from the Earth. Therefore let us examine human nature, red in tooth and claw.

It will all perish, and not all whites are beautiful. I am not and am white as well. His sources are YouTube videos as well as an article about mentally ill mothers killing their children … not tacky at all!

Further nonsense:

Men are by nature murderers of their rivals. Women are by nature murderers of their children.

The problem of government is to prevent man from slaying man. The problem of patriarchy is to prevent woman from slaying child.

A human infant is most in danger from his mother. A child is most in danger from his stepfather (or mother’s boyfriend). In these cases, abuse often happens with the tacit consent or active participation of the mother.

A father is a child’s primary bodyguard, and an experienced man knows from whom he is guarding it. A father is often the only one willing and able to fight, kill and die for a child.

If you want to know why Feminism is destroying America, it’s because women do not like weak men. Refusal to confront the reality of female nature has doomed American men to experience the predictions of the anti-suffragettes in full.

Women are this way to ensure their children survive. They are voting against the “patriarchy” because they do not accept American men as husbands.

So an infant is most in danger from his mother, but women want their children to survive. Uhu. This is such a contradiction, he cannot be serious; Christ even says the anguish of the woman will give way to joy once her child is born. But we know already that he is a Christian who rejects the Bible.

Also, claiming that women do not want American men is only partially true, as they still have children and not all of those children are born to non-whites. He just piles up baseless claims upon baseless claims.

Writing that a father is often the only one willing to die for a child: no, we lived in a civilized society for hundreds of years, what you are describing sounds like some savage village; hardly a place where the Mona Lisa could have been painted, or Beethoven’s sixth composed. You seem to care about the children getting aborted, too. Why care about them? Because of society going downhill? But why care about this, if the Bible is not trustworthy?

I remember reading a post on his blog KoanicSoul where he tried to argue that we do not need God or the Bible for morality, evolution suffices. This is the same trash that atheists try to defend; it is not even possible given that if with evolution he means mere survival, killing the sick and the poor would be allowed; whitewashing rape would be fine, too.

Further dung from Leo Littlebook:

Kinship bonds are based on genetic interest, and have a profound effect on behavior, allowing ants to account for about 17% of terrestrial animal biomass:

> ’Think about it from the perspective of the genes. The selfish genes want to fill the world with copies of themselves. For a gene carried by a human — or dog, or rabbit, or a spider — the best that gene can do is to create offspring that are 50% genetically similar, and keep cranking them out: have lots of kids. But let’s say that the selfish, self-replicating gene is carried by a female ant. If that ant starts having lots of ant babies, the babies will be 50% genetically similar to her — about as good as a human would be. But remember, that ant’s sisters are all 75% genetically similar to her. From her genes’ perspective, her ideal ‘reproductive’ strategy isn’t to reproduce at all: it’s to increase the number of sisters she has. The most important thing for that female ant is for the queen to stay alive as long as possible.”

Kuiper, “Re: Dragonize”, chapter 34: “Evolution“

That’s why women have evolved to like men who indulge in light bedroom sadism. As the husband forcefully seizes the means of reproduction, he demonstrates that cruelty towards his children will not be tolerated, from anyone. Hence why women like being choked. The lover and the fighter both go for the throat.

This stuff is all irrelevant, no one thinks in terms of “genetic interests” except a sex-nerd like koanic. (“Kuiper”: this is from some low quality fan fiction trash site I would not even read if they paid me for it.)

Women also never evolved, because evolution is false. Where is the proof it ever happened? Vox Day does not buy it either, calling himself an evolution skeptic. Any sadism is just mental illness. I have no interest of choking anyone, nor do I know anyone who would approve of this deranged behaviour.

We are humans, not ants or spiders, why would I act on such a level? Leo Littlebook reads like an autist. Genes cannot be selfish either, this is what Dicky Dawkins wants to teach you. He bases his wordlview on such fluff!

choked is a link to steamcommunity.com, no joke! These are his sources. 4chan, reddit, gaming sites. As if people aren’t making things up online, as if this stuff is credible … I am sure if he said this to some average person on the street, he would look at you in disbelief, yet he claims that all women want or expect this.

Choking, killing, fighting: who lives this way? Our grandparents, our ancestors? Civilized people do not. Why even have mercy on the poor, old and sick? Why not get rid of them? Why not turn into a full barbarian and do nothing except wreak havoc so that we are manly and turn everything into an even more horrible hellhole?

Further stupidity from Leo Littlebook:

My knife at your neck
your sheathe on my dick;
We’ll pass the time
and make it go quick.

Women are like cats: They like getting scratched. If you find this shocking, appalling and horrifying, then you deny female nature, and have no clue why American women are aborting their babies in favor of cats. Enjoy learning the lesson of civilizational collapse the hard way.

First off, I do not know if this doggerel above is his or not; certainly embarrassing and vulgar to say the least.

And, again, you, at least I, do not win anything by having children. They could all die or become mentally ill. I am mentally ill, why would I bring someone into this world? So that he has to suffer by getting bullied by such egomaniacs as you are, Leo Littlebook? To be a doormat for your wicked lust of inflicting pain onto others?

We already had collapses before, this is nothing new, what is new is the technological level reached. There is no female nature, and if there is, it is just as base and boring as male nature. There is no average man or woman; I hardly have much in common with most men, which means, obviously, that this also goes for women.

What many online, including this guy, will do when writing about men and women is to exaggerate certain traits and claim that this is male or female nature. As if all men have PhDs in physics or are six feet tall.

Instead of trying to appear manly online by using very short sentences and acting as if one knows exactly when, where and how the collapse happens despite believing the Bible to be corrupted, i. e. not even having a clear standard of truth, you could also keep your mouth shut and spare us this nonsense, better read Spengler, Toynbee, Burckhardt instead. Or any serious book for that matter, instead of skimming blog posts and comments, then present this as some kind of deep knowledge and wholesome education.

Regarding the technical details of the collapse, he cannot have more knowledge about such a scenario than Piero San Giorgio or Michael Greer. So why read this useless drivel by Leo Littlebook?

He has too much time on his hands and cooks up fringe theories that he would never have come into contact with a few decades, let alone more than a hundred years ago when he would have worked on the fields.

Instead, being a fanboy of autistic and mentally ill Ed Dutton, he instead takes Sir John Glubb seriously! He would not even know about him without Dutton; Spengler or Ernst von Lasaulx are too hard too read for him, apparently. He hardly ever mentions any thinkers or writers of worth. I guess taking time to read and digest such authors is too tiresome, it takes too much time. He needs it fast, quick, “efficient.”

What I find shocking is that men online talk about sex only, despite claiming to have such high IQs. Strange that in the works of real geniuses, I hardly come across such vulgar and crude writings.

Also, if he is so smart, why did he study communications, as one source claims (his name being Leo Buchignani or, in full, Leo Joseph Buchignani III.) According to linkedin, he is a High IQ writer, teacher and software developer.

This seems to explain his autism. Hopefully, the Chinese throw him out of their country. Why even live there? What is the point?

Apparently he does not even understand that in the past, you first had to ask the woman’s father for permission, it was not allowed to simply walk up to a woman and talk to her with the motive of having sexual relations. You guys are not only nuts, but uneducated.

That said, there’s no need to imitate BDSM degenerates, if that’s not your style. Fingernails suffice. Learn MMA, and your body becomes a weapon to tease her with. No need for bondage when you know how to wrestle.

I find props just get in the way, but blindfolding her is fun. The point is not that men are into this, but that women are. Read the subreddit’s comments; the thirst is unreal.

That is just tacky. So empty.

Why would I take anything on a site like reddit, 4chan and all the other vulgar online barrelhouses and honky-tonks seriously? Where most are vulgar, mentally ill people with deranged views who are drug addicts, feel lonely and want attention?

This is a joke! He thinks reddit is a credible source! People do not lie, they do not role play online? MMA: like Andrew Tate? Did Shakespeare or Goethe do MMA?

90% of the battle is choosing the right woman. I married a good girl, and we’ve never done any S&M. The most I do is a mild squeeze with my fingers to the sides of her neck for a light blood choke during sex sometimes, to intensify things for her. But that’s not because she needs it to behave; it’s just letting her feel womanly and dominated (to cum harder). It’s obvious when she’s into it.

(You can do this to yourself right now with one hand; you’ll feel increased blood pressure in your head. It’s harmless in small doses.)

Never choke someone unless you’ve been choked a lot in jiu jitsu first, so you know how to do it safely. People die, and then you’ll get stabbed in prison. A lot.

Most smart guys don’t want to abuse animals, let alone women. They’d much rather carefully select a wife who doesn’t need it. Here’s four tests to vet a wife:

1. IQ - strongest predictor in psychometrics [link to some Danish psychopath];
mostly inherited from the mother
2. Unvaxxed pureblood - for ovaries uncorrupted by mRNA [links to some news site]
3. Hymen - best odds of fidelity
4. DNA - 3rd to 4th cousin = highest interfertility [links to Wikipedia. No joke.]

The vast majority of women will eliminate themselves by refusing the test.

Fathers of homeschooled daughters are sitting on a goldmine. Isaac took his wife from her father’s house for a reason.

Again, why not stop with your Bible thumping if you believe Holy Scripture to be corrupted? What is your standard? You pick from the Bible what suits your sinful nature that you are unable to overcome. So instead you turn it into a virtue.

As if Bart Ehrman’s arguments convinced us who have been born-again. It does not impress me in the slightest. You have to deny that such an experience is possible, that it has moral value, i.e. comes about because of repentance of sin which is evil and defined by God who is Jesus Christ, as the Bible teaches.

On Vox Day’s blog, koanic wrote that Protestants are always winning against Catholics because they know the Bible or so, now he lectures evangelicals that they base their views on the Bible? Is he schizophrenic? Or someone who has fallen away as Hebrews 6:4-6 warns?

That fathers of homeschooled daughters are sitting on a goldmine is only true as long as those daughters are all “10s”, as you sex-crazed imbeciles would likely object.

Vox Day himself agreed in reply to another comment that koanic is pretty arrogant, but I do not remember the exact words he used. Very tiring.

As if it is not tacky at all to talk about such intimate details; let alone of such a nature. You have several screws loose if you really mean it. A prole. You would have belonged to the serfs in times when the Ancient Regime still stood. (A thinker like Fichte saw it this way, that men who boast about their sexual life are primitive.)

That he takes random internet sources seriously is laughable given his claims of having a superior IQ.

The thing is I do not care about my life, about this existence at all. I only live because God forces me, otherwise I would end it, and with it my awful loser existence full of mental and physical pain. Why endure this if eternity does not exist? You are a hedonist, that is all. I am not. You will die just like me; of cancer, a heart attack, maybe via accident. You have grasped less of Christ than did an outspoken atheist like Schopenhauer; all because of your lack of depth, which shows itself in your sex obsession.

He also has a skewed view of intelligence and how it is inherited, which is still unknown:

Maternal IQ contributes disproportionately to that of her children, so it’s worth aiming high.

or:

How to select a woman as a foreigner? Identifying a quality woman is easier than you think. Just filter red flags and select for IQ. It is the master variable, severely undervalued, a market inefficiency the wise exploit. Looks are correlated, and health, and morals.

Not true at all, but okay. And his life, as we can see, revolves around women. It is all he has: claims of being superman, especially with women. Which does not interest me in the slightest as I, like Nils M. Holm wrote, have little in common with most people, including women.

Looks are not correlated with IQ much, otherwise MIT would be full of Cary Grants or Brigitte Bardots and so on. It is more junk science by the likes of Richard Lynn, J. P. Rushton, Edward Dutton.

Since very high IQs (above 145) are very rare anyway, all data here is anecdotal. Regarding height, Dutton made the claim as well that height and IQ are correlated. Yet, it does not seem as if many of those who had extremely high IQs or were seen as geniuses in the past—who certainly, despite lack of IQ testing, had high intelligence—were tall. Vox Day is 176, Chris Langan 180 centimeters tall. Schopenhauer was rather short, even for his time.

Imagine Beethoven, a huge genius who never married. He was busy being a genius, while koanic is choking women, feeling like Tarzan …

Though we do not need to go that far; Chris Langan, with an IQ of 195-210 would run circles around Koanic/Leo Littlebook and married too late. He was alone most of his life until being almost fifty years old. He does not have children, and his worldview is a lot more mature than what koanic forces down our throats.

He also likens all of this to a “market”, just like Vox Day, showing that he is an NPC who parrots such boilerplate points himself. Which is what it is: boilerplate/diatribe I have read numerous times online now. This is what Andy Nowicki once called Vox Day’s horrible Darkstream Men Going Evil’s Way.

Apart from the fact that morality and intelligence are not correlated, neither are looks or height and so on. All such correlations are very weak at best. That IQ is mostly inherited from the mother is wrong; he bases this on an article by Emil O. W. Kirkegaard, a rather creepy Danish narcissist/psychopath who finds no fault with sexually abusing someone as long as the victim is asleep.

This all screams ego, narcissism, me, me, me. Koanic/Leo Littlebook suffers from a superiority complex. Vox Day is arrogant enough. This guy, though, tops even him! And Vox Day is humble enough to write that most likely no one exists today who understands Genesis completely. Yet, koanic wants to have unearthed some truths from it no one else has, even though he does not even understand that sex is a curse that did not exist in Garden Eden.

Further idiocy regarding Genesis:

Do I really believe that God created Adam and Eve? No. I doubt “God” needs to use anesthetic to surgically remove Adam’s regenerating short rib and fashion the pluripotent bone marrow stem cells therein to clone an XX chromosome Eve out of XY chromosome Adam. That sounds more like something a genetic engineer would do. However, being perceived as God would be useful for obtaining compliance from primitives. The name for God used in early Genesis, “Elohim”, isn’t particularly monotheistic.

I believe the book of Genesis is extremely old, and contains more wisdom than is apparent at first glance. It might be the closest thing to an instruction manual we have. What better time to consult the instruction manual than now, when shit hath gang agley? Shall we return defective Eve to the manufacturer, or what?

Why does he put God in scare quotes? Why would it be hard to imagine that God created man, given that he created the whole universe?

If this is his understanding of Genesis, what else is there left to say? This guy has no clue. So God did not create life, but gods do exist? Does he know Hebrew? What better time than now? Have you read a history book in your life, or are you as uneducated as you appear to be?

How were the Hebrews primitive, they were literate people. He does not understand the word monotheistic.

Some of the men he cites are also high in narcissism, i.e. most likely awful and asocial:

Women who are too smart for their own good get “ideas”. Barring a total idiot, I’d rather marry a woman a few pegs less on the IQ scale than me. I think it’s ideal. I like impressing my wife with my amazing intellect and ideas, and teaching her things.

So this guy even admits he has a frail ego. Man. How alpha. Again I ask: is this satire? He is most likely not that smart anyway. Which is fine; people who boast about their lives online are disgusting, though. Apart from the fact that being on the net a lot is basically the definition of the loser; which I readily admit I am, but then again, I do not lie about some grand life I am living online.

Koanic then repeats the nonsense about how important maternal IQ is and so on, which he has no clue about, as he just parrots the Duttonkirkegaardwoodleys.

I have linked to Nils M. Holm before. He writes that the two 145+ IQ people he knew mostly grew up with the parent that was not an intellectual and did not have any interest in intellectual pursuits; the intellectual parent was not available most of the time. He does not name which one, it reads as if they grew up with a single mother, but I could be wrong.

The mothers of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were described as simple, though Nietzsche’s was daughter of a pastor, and Kierkegaard’s was closely related to his father (third-cousin or so, which would support his case.)

(The wife of Darwin was his first cousin, though his sons were part of the Royal Society.)

It is also nothing special to be aware of the fact that the usual claims of inbreeding depression are overblown; I was thinking about cousin marriage being not that detrimental to intelligence a lot before crazy persons like Dutton, whom koanic takes seriously, wrote about it. The multiculturalists, for example HBD idiots, were getting on my nerves, and I was aware of several geniuses having had parents that were nth cousins, like Kierkegaard.

Further nonsense about evolution:

That is how evolution is supposed to work: nearby organisms breed with each other. Genes are synergistic and evolve cooperatively. Randomly mixing them with foreign genes destroys the local synergies that have developed. If a gene is globally dominant, then it will propagate steadily across the leaky boundaries of these village/tribal “cells” until all of Eurasia carries the gene. Meanwhile, each cell still preserves its genetic diversity, preserving the potential for future breakthroughs along its unique line of “research”.

This has never been observed, so why lie and act as if you did? What does cell mean here anyway, in scare quotes even? How is this science, and why do you lack knowledge about epistemology? Life evolving would be a historical event anyway, you are just making things up.

He complains about Christians not buying into his deranged and wrong quackery regarding Genesis (as if Spinoza never existed):

The Bible is obviously corrupted by conflicting agendas, some of them evil. As the Bible grows increasingly obsolete in the face of the dawning new age, its adherents retreat into fortresses of rigid doctrinal illiteracy, sacrificing mental flexibility in favor of memorizing and reiterating orthodoxy, in a desperate attempt to keep their breeders committed, as bonobophile wolves feast on their hapless flock. The result is that I can find no Christian right-wing forum that will hear me interpret the deeper truths of Genesis; a pity. Good luck going the way of the Mormon.

I have personally witnessed how lambs are lost to the Left, and devised a gentle course of red pills to inoculate against it. But since Christians will not hear it, let them stick to their false idols, their deaf and blind dogmatic trivia, and see how far that gets them with the ladies. I suspect girls will continue to prefer astrology; you have to admire their intuition.

Acting as if he is our Messiah. Not our false idols. Dogmatic trivia — as opposed to Leo Littlebook being busy copulating and sophistically choking his wife … Man … This has to be satire.

He still does not get it. Faith is not passed on via having children. Has he ever read Luther or Kierkegaard or Pascal? Worse, his idiot Dutton which he cites even claims that religious people have more children on average; apparently it gets them rather far with “the ladies”. Noting here, again, that for a psychopath like koanic/Leo Littlebook, it is all about sex, that is all that interests him. He is shallow. His rhetoric—that we ought to admire the intuition of “girls”—is getting old.

Mental flexibility, meaning heresy? His gentle course was a link to one of his posts of which the filename already gave away its content, I therefore did not open it. Most likely useless tacky trash, as is to be expected from him.

By whose standard the Bible is evil he cannot answer. By his? Why would I care? I do not like life. I would commit suicide. It would be okay were I God, because were I God I would not create anything, just kill myself. Now, I am not God, and koanic is not either. That the Bible will become more and more obsolete is what the Bible itself teaches, why else would Christ ask if faith is still to be found when He returns? I hanged myself thirteen years ago, back when I was an atheist.

How are you going to witness for Christ, defend the faith, when rejecting the book that teaches us about God? He once wrote he feared damnation because he had a harem of sixteen or so Chinese women. Sounds pretty tacky and trashy, why does he think we ought to listen to him? Why fear it, if you reject Holy Scripture anyway? You want to gain the world, and will lose your soul in the end.

That the Bible is corrupted is a claim he cannot back up anyway, it would not be possible either. Who then decides what is true and what is false? The great and humble koanic/Leo Littlebook? Is he insane?

After all, why ought I not to commit suicide? If you reject the Bible, then we may also reject eternal damnation. When I am dead, I do not care anymore about my life or what sex-crazed imbeciles like koanic write online. I would be freed from this awful life I never asked for in the first place.

The Bible growing obsolete is a claim no Christian could make, except if he meant it as the Bible itself teaches it in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3. Why not simply call yourself an atheist? What are you afraid of? You are mentally deranged and insane, koanic/Leo Littlebook. You do not even know Latin and Greek, let alone Hebrew and Aramaic; instead, he puts the King James version on a pedestal.

Another ridiculous claim, given how dogmatic he is himself:

The American conservative religious demographics with positive fertility tend to feature extreme insularity of some kind, whether it be Mormon cultishness, evangelical narrowminded doctrinal rigidity, or Amish Luddism. Embracing these subcultures means accepting that a percentage of one’s family will leave due to reasonable objections, potentially causing divorce rape or teenage rebellion with disastrous consequences. These subcultures embrace shaming or exclusion in some form to preserve their cohesion, so one is essentially sacrificing those family members to achieve insulation from the general American culture.

Reasonable objections: how does he even know that people care about this stuff anyway? Maybe they just want to be part of a community. Not everyone is an annoying Weisenheimer like koanic/Leo Littlebook and needs to be seen as the smartest all the time because of having a frail ego. Given how he rams his views down our throats, is almost always correct and uses derogaroy language to silence his critics, I would rather say he is just projecting.

He is weak. He is obsessed with women, with losing them and being alone. He cannot be alone because he lacks spirit, as Kierkegaard would say. He is a weakling, but needs to shield this from us by wanting to appear tough. His persona he has built online is of a very fringe nature, and not in a good way. There were fringe thinkers like Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche. Koanic, though, seems like a mentally ill crackpot. David Icke does not appear as deranged as he does in his writing either.

Further biased nonsense:

Perhaps American bachelors should seek a girl from rural Germany, since the body count is the lowest of any White country I can find. Pastor Steven Anderson did well with that, meeting his wife Zsuzsanna Tóth in Munich. They now have many White children.

Yes, a very German first name … Zsuzsanna … Man, do you even have a brain? Are you this stupid? Is this satire? Hello! Is this satire? He also linked to a picture of a blonde, rural woman from Germany. A photo very likely from a professional studio with a woman from Eastern Europe. The usual agitprop.

Munich is not rural, either, around fifty-five percent living there are already non-German.

Needless to say that he is a globalist himself if he supports simply getting a woman from other countries. Just like Dutton, who lives in Finland and married a female pastor. I am not kidding.

What are you going to save here anyway? Get a slavic woman from Germany, move her to China and save white Europeans? Nothing will be saved here; in the end, we have to save our souls. Your worldview itself is corrupted. By rejecting Christ and what the apostles died for, you cannot call yourself a Christian. Your are too proud to bow your knee, that is all.

A know-it-all who only wastes time. Awful, just awful what kind of idiocy we have to endure online because semi-educated people think they have it all figured out for the first time in human history!

A whole day going to waste because of this idiot! Thankfully, I never worked in my life and live off of the state, as I was suffering from depression my whole life, unlike Leo Littlebook, who is a shallow pollyanna lacking depth yet presents himself as a thinker.

koanic/Leo Littlebook is absolutely obsessed with sex, it is what is on his mind almost most of the time, which is why he hardly reads any books. His substack page is proof of this, where he reviews dime novels full of vulgar language and lots of—we guessed it—sex sex sex. He even takes Vox Day’s socio-sexual hierarchy seriously, while rejecting the Bible (yet he is somehow obsessed with it too) and accepting evolution via natural selection, which Vox Day rejects as well.

He apparently lives in China and is married. If he is married to a Chinese woman even, I do not know why anyone should take him seriously for a second. The vulgarity one has to endure nowadays is simply preposterous.

Immigration does not get stopped by having many children, as even Andy Nowicki, who otherwise always speaks out against abortion and is pro-family, understands and accepts. A change of mind is needed, which then may also create stronger families again. Until then, egging men on to marry and have children will only create despair and anger. Even a white nationalist like Wilmot Robertson (John Humphrey Ireland) wrote that in an overpopulated world, whites, too, ought to limit their family size.

I have to stop now, as I basically disagree with almost everything he writes, and he writes on a subject as intimate as sexual relations in a manner that makes me want to throw up. When I picture him I see a prole wanting to act “smart” like Andrew Tate.

Apart from some obscure qresearch where he even admits that he is on 4chan (!!), he also had a file about Christ’s death, but given how deranged and semi-educated he is, I will not read this. One of the first sentences read “I rely on the Sasquatch Message for galactic historical context and my understanding of Cosmic Law”. Okay.

I took a look regardless and the cat is out of the bag. He hangs around some web board (I searched for a sentence verbatim, it came up.) Not sure why he would do that given that he is such a stud-muffin … but okay.

I quote some nonsense he wrote on this web board about the pseudoscience remote viewing he takes at face value, there he also writes that Jesus Christ is not God. Not joking! I did not even know anything about remote viewing and had to look it up. At least, GotQuestions has an article on it. Seems extremely horrible stuff, an absolute time waster, almost worse than murder.

He then mentions the Heavenly Father, of whom he cannot have any knowledge except through the Bible, which warns against the practice of occultism. This seems to imply that he is either a really vile and evil or confused person.

He occupies himself with all this quackery and yet puts people down for having learnt ancient languages that he denigrates as dead ones? You are just lazy and prole. That is all.

Quote:

To cling to comforting myths I hold in contempt, which is why I informed my devout parents before 13 that I was agnostic because my religious upbringing was an arbitrarily-selected accident of birth.

I am Y-DNA I1 Nordic. Our people are not given to fear; we have no shortage of gods. In fact, sometimes we are mistaken for gods, or feared like one.

> a book that old and that important has close to 99.9999 percent chance to be wrong, off or inaccurate in some way or even edited maliciously for control purposes.

The New Testament is anti-Jewish propaganda crafted by Roman Illuminati, as should be obvious from the caricatured villainy of Jerusalem’s Jews and the overwrought nobility of Pilate. The Christian religion divided the “Jews” (which included regional monotheists in general) and made them a pro-Roman sect. This eventually became the foundation of the Roman state. Today the Vatican is one of the three pillars of the evil Cabal enslaving Humanity, the other two being the City of London and Washington DC.

> where do you think in Christianity or Catholicism does the truth end?

Did you even read it? My sources are not remotely orthodox. The lie that God the Father required Jesus’ crucifixion as a blood sacrifice for our sins is a Reptilian mindfuck. Jesus was the son of Joseph, not God.

> the fear of humanizing Jesus thus lowering his perceived power in some way.

He is human, not a god. His healing abilities were shamanic and learned from spirit guides such as Sasquatch. Yeshua of Krotea is an Ascended Master from an extraterrestrial race, and not a god either. There are no gods, only our particular Source and the Heavenly Father. But there are many higher beings, some of them egregores sustained by worship, others people empowered by loosh. That is why the Cabal owns the celebrity business. It is their drug of choice, and necessity.

Now, this is not convincing at all. Especially since this seems to center around some mentally ill professor of mathematics who believes that remote viewing is something anyone should take seriously.

Roman Illuminati: not even Eduard Meyer would have used such a cheap “argument”. Does he buy this or is he making fun of people? What he offers is just his own philosophy, and philosphy is opinion, as Vox Day once rightly noted. Theology, then, is opinion based on the Bible.

The guy trying to imply that the Bible must be inaccurate because of its age apparently does not understand how sources are deemed trustworthy. By this standard, he would have to call the existence of Alexander the Great into question, too, as Vox Day correctly noted in his The Irrational Atheist. Basically, he would not be able to believe any history.

How did the Early Church control Christians? They had to control their lusts, of course, as we all ought to. They could not know that the Church would become so huge, even Paul thought Christ would return during his lifetime. So this is false.

Apart from this, what would I gain by not living according to the Bible? As I wrote a thousand times on this site, I do not like my life. And rich people are suffering from illnesses or boredom, too. The Illuminati et cetera are subject to living in a fallen world as well.

caricatured villainy: this is just your subjective opinion. If they wanted it to be a forgery, this would not even make sense. And what did they “forge”? All of it? Even Paul’s sophisticated epistles? Most people did not read the Bible in the past, and Christians were murdered for centuries. It makes little sense to force such a morality onto people without the love of the Holy Spirit, which is what they tried in communist Russia, where it horribly failed, as Kuehnelt-Leddihn noted.

Does not make much sense to forge the New Testament anyway, no one gained much by living as a Christian back then in an earthly sense. Stranger even to think that someone would make up verses like Matthew 19:14. Leo Littlebook’s parents were devout Christians, he may have an axe to grind. A kind of Messiah complex for sure, he also writes as if he is Christ himself.

was an arbitrarily-selected accident of birth: it is not a sign of maturity to cling to viewpoints one entertained as a teenager. It is just as arbitrary that you are now using computers—using overpriced Apple hardware!—to surf the web all day and cobble together an awful worldview you otherwise would never have come across.

there are no gods: yes, there are, as the Old Testament teaches, and the second commandment is about such gods. Baal and Moloch were worshipped. This is the best knowledge we have, your esoteric gibberish is of no interest. You reject the New Testament because of your sex obsession; you cannot stand that God praises celibacy. You were too weak to live celibate, now you need to reject God Himself.

This is absolutely not convincing at all; a forgery that saves souls and has transformed Europe into Christendom, the greatest civilization to ever have existed. This is nothing a mere human being could have conceived of. Which the Bible did not even intend, as Wilhelm Stapel notes in his work defending Christ against those rightists in the 1920/30s who were atheists.

People were not dumber back then. That they were incapable of forgery is nothing anybody would believe. After all, during the Dreyfus affair, an important document was found to be a forgery created by Henry; discovering this forgery took just two years or so.

This accident of birth dung is old, I became a Christian at age thirty. Further, eternal damnation is not comforting, and I could end up there only because of some imbecile’s lust; an argument where koanic, on Vox Day’s blog, went furious. He knows it is true, is a weakling for not accepting that sex is a curse from God. Otherwise no one would bring anyone into this mess, this madhouse the world is.

The argument he comments on—the likelihood of such an old document being wrong—can easily be refuted, given that the margin of error is less than two percent, and no other ancient document has as many copies as the New Testament. The findings of Nag Hammadi even strengthened it even more.

Not much to comment on here, then, given that koanic or now Leo Littlebook has basically shown himself to be a false teacher indeed. I remember his comments on Vox Day’s blog, where he was citing the Bible, lecturing Christians. Now, he seems to be an atheist with weirdo views. New age rhymes with sewage. What else is this?

With the blood sacrifice not being necessary in his eyes, ought we to sacrifice animals again? Does he think his arrogance is not sinful? That there are many higher beings and so on is nothing he can know; all this pretense of having secret knowledge is getting old. Such people usually are narcissists and psychopaths; people to be avoided.

He claims that there is only our Source, whatever that is, and the Heavenly Father. How does he know this? What is Source? Lord Source? Or Sauce? Idiot.

This seems to be some guy’s spiritual system he adheres to who is named Padgett. On his—very feminine-looking—website he claims that Hell is not for eternity, or that some ancestor or so was able to contact Caesar. This is not helpful, this is just more ego-boasting. I do not know this Padgett guy or why Leo Littlebook/koanic is bowing before his feet, but I do know that I suffer from physical pain that is tormenting me on most days as well as a form of permanent depression similar to what Christians like Kierkegaard or Pascal, or the lesser-known Reinhold Schneider described.

How is their Source magic any answer to this? They deny the divinity of Christ, yet are against world-wide suicide booths!

This does not make any sense, it is an affront! Why can’t they simply bow before the cross and we all live according to the New Testament, which is already hard enough? It is their egos that want to deny that they cannot know everything, they want it all figured out.

And why would I care about some enslavement when I am enslaved by my horrible genetics? It does not matter if in a wiser society it would have been possible to sterilize my father, hunchbacked piece of dung he is, because I am alive now and have to live this repulsive existence I never asked for among you sex-obsessed narcissists now.

His nordic DNA dung is laughable given that there is a photo of him on Kiwifarms. I, too, have nordic DNA or whatever, since my father had red hair and blue eyes. So what? Just more of Leo Littlebook’s usual puffing himself up. Maybe his father ignored him? Go away.

From another post by Leo Littlebook, showing what crazy new age idiocy he buys into:

The astral projection community knows that the Cosmos is manifold, because the astral diverges from the physical as soon as one exits one’s body. It is hard to miss that multiple versions of one’s bedroom exist. Below is a good explanation of the vagaries of remote viewing and astral projection, due to the manifold nature of the Cosmos and the intuitive interconnectedness of Consciousness:

{He pasted a link to reddit regarding this astral nonsense. No joke!}

I haven’t seen Farsight make any effort during interpretation to distinguish realities, which suggests they have not compared notes with the larger astral projection community.

It makes little sense that God would go to all this effort just to create just one singular timeline. Even human imagination can do better. Have some faith in Divine creativity.

Again, who cares what you care about or what makes sense to you! As if your own limited imagination is somehow the gold standard of all existence and the whole universe. Get over yourself! Get over yourself! I do not care about your Mickey Mouse beliefs, I would, as said, kill myself were I not a Christian believing in eternal damnation. You never had to die on any battlefield like millions before us; your laughable astral nonsense helps no one, it only puffs up your huge ego. Despite having no reason of it being so inflated.

One genius going by the name Manuel wrote:

Simple truth is: There is no ISBE with the attribute of the “Messiah” or “Son of God” or something like this. What is called “Christ” or “Christ consciousness” is an invention of the mind, a projection of who we want to be – a whole being in harmony with the universe.

Then there were hundreds if not thousands of people who have been crucified. It’s a karmic consequence unfolding again and again, having its root in the first schism of the mind, when evil itself was discovered, leading to the brother killing the brother.

Everbody who was crucified had an impact on the human psyche. They had fathers and mothers. They had brothers and sisters. They have been loved like anybody else. Names don’t matter …

So, this guy is obviously not very intelligent, otherwise he would not pile baseless claim upon baseless claim, thinking he somehow is uttering some simple truth.

He talks about evil but, like Leo Littlebook, is unable to define it. I do not think that suicide is evil, or murder of my father and ancestors. So what? Now what? Imbeciles!

I do not want to be: I live because I was born-again and believe that Christ is God, which you still have not been able to show to be wrong. I would otherwise end my life—kill myself—, because I hate it and never asked for it in the first place. Unlike Leo Littlebook, this imbecile, I would not even live his life (or mine) if I got paid for it.

You also have no idea if they had fathers, even siblings! Preposterous! Who are you! What are such cretins thinking? This is the brain of an average Joe; I never again want to have its contents vomitted out in front of me again.

He also seems to take seriously a so-called Sasquatch message to humanity, of which a descriptions reads:

SunBôw received and transcribed these messages from an Elder Sasquatch named Kamooh in 2015 while in British Columbia, Canada. The Sasquatch People asked us to disseminate the information as it’s a message to the world for us each to do our part to save Earth and the human race! Our Sasquatch Elders want to “talk” with people in a powerful decision-making capacity because someone must comprehend all the negativity that is happening and take the lead in creating a peaceful and environmentally-friendly world for a healthier planet in Spirit, Mind, and Body

Saving the Earth and the human race: sounds rather fishy, not something I would buy into, and far from Christian. It cannot be saved.

Worse, Leo Littlebook, writing as Cyberthal takes seriously quackery like Dark Matter, thinking that this would strengthen his case for whatever own quackery he presents us. One of his ticks is to create categories. Prior to this not just useless but harmful nonsense, he created Edenism, where he shoehorned people into such credible-sounding categories like melon heads; I forgot the rest of this irrelevant idiocy his sycophant Aeoli Pera was very much into. Even muflax, who “is” now a “woman”, bought into this.

So he buys into maintream science like Evolution and Dark Matter, yet accepts obvious scams like remote viewing? Only because he thinks what cool and normal people accept cannot be true, therefore the opposite has to be? His worldview is full of holes, he just picks and chooses what suits his fancy. This is even more problematic regarding his reading of the Bible. After all, even Luther had to accept the epistle of Jacob.

Now he talks about Lizard, Ant, Bird people and so on. Yawn.

I stop now, reading such vile, crude and almost evil rubbish was torturous.

One can hardly improve upon what Nicolás Gómez Dávila, this brilliant Colombian reactionary wrote about the topic:

Believe in God, trust in Christ, look with suspicion.

Nobody, nothing, in the end forgives.
Except Christ.

The defeated reactionary always retains the option of entertaining himself with the victor’s simplistic ideas.

Our soul has a future.
Humanity has none.

A high “intelligence quotient” is indication of distinguished mediocrity.

Man is important only if it is true that a God has died for him.

Individualism is the cradle of vulgarity.

Why deceive ourselves? Science has not answered a single important question.

Fools believe that humanity only now knows certain important things, when there is nothing important which humanity has not known since the beginning.

What Ludwig XIV. or Goethe did not require, for example, can serve us as a criterion for what is useless.

The modern clergy believe they can bring man closer to Christ by insisting on Christ’s humanity.
Thus forgetting that we do not trust in Christ because He is man, but because He is God.

Someone who has been defeated should not console himself with the possible retaliations of history, but with the patent excellence of his cause.

Man’s three enemies are: the devil, the state, and technology.

The American is not intolerable because he believes he is important individually, but because he possesses, insofar as he is an American, the solution to every problem.

When it comes to knowledge of man, there is no Christian (provided he is not a progressive Christian) whom anybody has anything to teach.

Eugenics appals those who fear its judgment.

The importance it attributes to man is the enigma of Christianity.

Sex does not solve even sexual problems.

In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in corrupting.

No beneficiary of slaves is supporter of birth control.

To love one’s neighbor is without doubt a commandment, but the gospel is the love that awaits us.

Because we know that God cares about the individual, let us not forget that He seems to care little about humanity.

Let us tremble if we do not sense, in this abject modern world, that with each day our neighbor is less and less our peer.

Happily, the world cannot be explained.
(What kind of world would it be if it could be explained by man?)

The people were spiritually rich until the semi-educated decided to educate them.

If one does not believe in God, the only honest alternative is vulgar utilitarianism.
The rest is rhetoric.

If man ever managed to fabricate a man, the enigma of man will not have been deciphered, but obscured.

Christianity, when it abolishes its ancient liturgical languages, degenerates into strange, uncouth sects.
Once contact is broken with Greek and Latin antiquity, once its medieval and patristic inheritance is lost, any simpleton turns into its exegete.

To appreciate the ancient or the modern is easy; but to appreciate the obsolete is the triumph of authentic taste.

The individual who lies to himself, just like the society that does not lie to itself, soon rots and dies.

Depopulate and reforest – first civilizing rule.

Although it grieves the angelism of the democrat: one cannot build a civilisation with miserable biological material.

The two most pressing problems of the contemporary world: demographic expansion and genetic deterioration are unsolvable.
Liberal principles prevent the solution of the first, egalitarian ones that of the second.

The majority of new customs are old behaviors that western civilization had shamefacedly confined to its lower-class neighborhoods.

Listening to one’s neighbor is one of the most tiresome works of mercy.