[Topics]

Hopefully my last word on you crude, rude brutes, i.e. sex-crazed imbeciles (mentally ill men.)

Written: 2023-10-11

To add to what Vox Day wrote above, you deranged psychopaths don’t need to wonder that more and more men are retreating, dropping out of society, are angry or depressed.

You, depraved guys like Giuseppe Filotto (“The Kurgan”), Leo Joseph Buchignani (“Leo Littlebook” / “koanic”), “Aeoli Pera”, Krauser PUA, Christopher Anderson (“fakesagan”), Chateau Heartiste, Roosh V., Rollo Tomassi, George Bruno—Jay Dyer even, despite his claim to actually never having been an atheist (why then live promiscuous?)—and so on are to blame for this dire situtation we are in.

Wow! Without the internet, I would not even know a single one of those miscreants I mention above, and there are many others! My horny, repugnant father is enough, isn’t he! I agree with Andy Nowicki that even those people one may have come in contact with online who had a positive influence are not worth the societal destruction brought about by social media. It needs to be eradicated.

How can you be so stupid to think teaching men to live sexually promiscuous lives, i. e. thinking that turning society into a giant brothel is not going to end in a chaos? You all lived this way, you all are at fault and responsible for this mess. You do it even now! Despite some of them claiming to be Christians, they continue to think that pick up artist methods are a good way of finding a wife. I am not joking!

No, not only are you shysters, some of them, like this Krauser PUA imbecile, even look like absolute criminals you do not want to have anything to do with. I guess Vox Day thinks that “men” like Jesse James are “alpha”, we ought to look up to them. That women fall time and again for such vermin actually shows that I am right and no sexual selection or female eugenics exists.

Yikes! No, they are weaklings, they are the ones who are losers. Some of our ancestors died on the battlefield, many of them virgins, others never seeing their children grow up, while vermin like Jesse James—who was married to Sandra Bullock (I wish I could blot out such “knowledege”)—have children with multiple women, destroying the society they live in.

… and then Vox Day comes along and says we even ought to live like them, emulate them, “learn” from them! While calling us losers — or “gammas,” which is even more ridiculous.

That is pretty rich.

That some, like this Krauser PUA guy seem to regret their lives, or became Christians like Roosh V. or Vox Day’s friend Filotto, only proves my point. Your lifestyle is to be rejected, it leads to destruction and ultimately to eternal damnation. I therefore question the motives of Vox Day.

Reading old posts by this Krauser PUA guy and the idiotic sycophants who write nonsense like “you are living every man’s dream” is almost sad if it weren’t so upsetting and vulgar. I would pay money for not having to live such a life.

As a Christian, Vox Day has to accept marriage and nothing else; yet he calls men “losers” in the sexual and marital “markets” (marriage which he and his sex-crazed posse destroyed.)

The vulgarity of PUA never appealed to me, and I hardly read much of it. All they “teach” is to become a slave to lust and act like a clown, a jester (or whatever.)

Since my outlook on all of this is similar to that of Andy Nowicki, who has been anti-sex from a young age as well—cf. his work Confessions of a Would-Be Wanker and Notes Before Death—, I was critical of this from the start, and never felt drawn to it, rather I was repulsed by it.

And I am not the only one who thinks that such a topic should not even be openly discussed much. I have quoted Chesterton, Sir Keith Joseph and Seneca earlier.

Nils M. Holm, who is member of the Triple Nine Society, which requires one to have an IQ of at least 146, thinks so as well. I quote from his book “Bridging the Gap. The Reconciliation of Intelligence and Culture”:

Not all men and women are as shallow as you imbeciles.

[…]
Of course there are foundations for inter-human relationships other than intellect. Love is probably the strongest bond between two human beings. However, love needs time to develop. Our culture is quick to use the word “love”, but what it mostly means is either “preference” or “lust”. Real love is what arises when two people who get along spend a lot of time with each other, share personal information, and agree at least upon the foundations that form their values. It requires dedication, reflexion, and tolerance.

Highly intelligent people certainly have the necessary dedication, because they are longing for a connection so much. Their intelligence is often also correlated with a hight degree of introspection, so reflexion should not be much of a hindrance, either. This depends a lot on the individual, though. Some high-IQ people do not care much about the nuances of interpersonal relatinships, because they are too absorbed in abstract topics. This can be a self-reinforcing mechanism: abstract topics are interesting, which makes people uninteresting, which increases the focus on abstract topics, etc. Once this mechanism is discovered, it can be abandoned, although this may take a while. Even though highly intelligent people are typically very good at changing habits, this is still a process that needs time.

The greater issue is that the ingredients for love have to be present on both sides of a relationship, and while it may not be that hard to find people who are dedicated, it may turn out to be quite an endeavor to find people who are equally introspective, and the different world views across the gap may stress tolerance beyond its breaking point.

Some highly intelligent people are equipped with an extreme degree of introspection. It is probably correlated with intelligence, because intelligence lifts all perception to the abstract level, sometimes even the (sic) “own” behavior. […]

Add to this the fact that class differences exist, and that the PUA dung would not have worked in societies where good breeding still reigned anyway, we can now conclude that all of this is nothing but hogwash by sex-obsessed, which means: mentally ill men who are also psychopaths.

As if you do not need to have something in common, as if women would not differ in their character, temperament, education and upbringing! Talking to women on the street only to copulate with them, as some like Krauser PUA try to sell men, is worse than murder.

Why do they feel the need to “teach” others? Given that this only exacerbates the vulgarity and decadence we in the West are suffering, they should be locked up at least, if not sentenced to death.

Let us now listen to a man of good breeding, a true gentleman, who was married for almost sixty years (until death.) - Nicolás Gómez Dávila:

The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.

The problem is not sexual repression, nor sexual liberation, but sex.

In a perfect penal code, vulgarity would be punished with the death penalty.

When the modern consciousness suspends its economic routines, it only oscillates between political anguish and sexual obsession.

Sexual promiscuity is the tip society pays in order to appease its slaves.

To liberate man is to subject him to greed and sex.

Men can be divided into those who make their life complicated to gain their soul and those who waste their soul to make their life easier.

Let us lament less the obscenity of today’s novelist than his misfortune.
When man becomes insignificant, copulation and defecation become important actions.

Sex does not solve even sexual problems.

In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in corrupting.

Sins that appear “splendid” from afar are from close up nothing more than small sordid episodes.

Modern man’s life oscillates between two poles: business and sex.