[Topics]
Hopefully my last word on you crude, rude brutes, i.e. sex-crazed imbeciles (mentally ill men.)
Written: 2023-10-11
To add to what Vox Day wrote
above,
you deranged psychopaths don’t need to wonder that more and more
men are retreating, dropping out of society, are angry or depressed.
You, depraved guys like Giuseppe Filotto (“The Kurgan”),
Leo Joseph Buchignani
(“Leo Littlebook” / “koanic”), “Aeoli Pera”, Krauser PUA, Christopher
Anderson (“fakesagan”), Chateau Heartiste, Roosh V., Rollo Tomassi,
George Bruno—Jay Dyer even, despite his claim to actually never having
been an atheist (why then live promiscuous?)—and so on are to blame
for this dire situtation we are in.
Wow! Without the internet, I would not even know a single one of
those miscreants I mention above, and there are many others! My
horny, repugnant father is enough, isn’t he! I agree with Andy
Nowicki that even those people one may have come in contact with online
who had a positive influence are not worth the societal destruction
brought about by social media. It needs to be eradicated.
How can you be so stupid to think teaching men to live sexually
promiscuous lives, i. e. thinking that turning society into a
giant brothel is not going to end in a chaos? You all lived this way,
you all are at fault and responsible for this mess. You do it even
now! Despite some of them claiming to be Christians, they continue
to think that pick up artist methods are a good way of
finding a wife. I am not joking!
No, not only are you shysters, some of them, like this Krauser PUA
imbecile, even look like absolute criminals you do not want to have anything
to do with. I guess Vox Day thinks that “men” like Jesse James are
“alpha”, we ought to look up to them. That women fall time and again for
such vermin actually shows that I am right and no sexual selection
or female eugenics exists.
Yikes! No, they are weaklings, they are the ones who are losers. Some of
our ancestors died on the battlefield, many of them virgins, others
never seeing their children grow up, while vermin like Jesse James—who
was married to Sandra Bullock (I wish I could blot out such
“knowledege”)—have children with multiple women, destroying the
society they live in.
… and then Vox Day comes along and says we even ought to live like them,
emulate them, “learn” from them! While calling us losers — or “gammas,”
which is even more ridiculous.
That is pretty rich.
That some, like this Krauser PUA guy seem to regret their lives,
or became Christians like Roosh V. or Vox Day’s friend Filotto,
only proves my point. Your lifestyle is to be rejected, it leads to
destruction and ultimately to eternal damnation. I therefore question
the motives of Vox Day.
Reading old posts by this Krauser PUA guy and the idiotic sycophants who
write nonsense like “you are living every man’s dream” is almost sad if
it weren’t so upsetting and vulgar. I would pay money for not having to
live such a life.
As a Christian, Vox Day has to accept marriage and nothing else; yet
he calls men “losers” in the sexual and marital “markets” (marriage
which he and his sex-crazed posse destroyed.)
The vulgarity of PUA never appealed to me, and I hardly
read much of it. All they “teach” is to become a slave to lust and
act like a clown, a jester (or whatever.)
Since my outlook on all of this is similar to that of Andy Nowicki,
who has been anti-sex from a young age as well—cf. his work
Confessions of a Would-Be Wanker
and
Notes Before Death—,
I was critical of this from the start, and never felt drawn to it, rather
I was repulsed by it.
And I am not the only one who thinks that such a topic should not even
be openly discussed much. I have quoted
Chesterton,
Sir Keith Joseph and
Seneca earlier.
Nils M. Holm,
who is member of the Triple Nine Society, which requires one to have
an IQ of at least 146, thinks so as well. I quote from his book
“Bridging the Gap. The Reconciliation of Intelligence and Culture”:
Not all men and women are as shallow as you imbeciles.
[…]
Of course there are foundations for inter-human relationships
other than intellect. Love is probably the strongest bond between
two human beings. However, love needs time to develop. Our culture is
quick to use the word “love”, but what it mostly means is either
“preference” or “lust”. Real love is what arises when two people who
get along spend a lot of time with each other, share personal
information, and agree at least upon the foundations that form their
values. It requires dedication, reflexion, and tolerance.
Highly intelligent people certainly have the necessary dedication,
because they are longing for a connection so much. Their intelligence
is often also correlated with a hight degree of introspection, so
reflexion should not be much of a hindrance, either. This depends a
lot on the individual, though. Some high-IQ people do not care much
about the nuances of interpersonal relatinships, because they are too
absorbed in abstract topics. This can be a self-reinforcing mechanism:
abstract topics are interesting, which makes people uninteresting, which
increases the focus on abstract topics, etc. Once this mechanism is
discovered, it can be abandoned, although this may take a while. Even
though highly intelligent people are typically very good at changing
habits, this is still a process that needs time.
The greater issue is that the ingredients for love have to be present
on both sides of a relationship, and while it may not be that hard to
find people who are dedicated, it may turn out to be quite an endeavor
to find people who are equally introspective, and the different world
views across the gap may stress tolerance beyond its breaking point.
Some highly intelligent people are equipped with an extreme degree of
introspection. It is probably correlated with intelligence, because
intelligence lifts all perception to the abstract level, sometimes even
the (sic) “own” behavior. […]
Add to this the fact that class differences exist, and that the PUA
dung would not have worked in societies where good breeding still reigned
anyway, we can now conclude that all of this is nothing but hogwash by
sex-obsessed, which means: mentally ill men who are also psychopaths.
As if you do not need to have something in common, as if women would not
differ in their character, temperament, education and upbringing!
Talking to women on the street only to copulate with them, as some like
Krauser PUA try to sell men, is worse than murder.
Why do they feel the need to “teach” others? Given that this only
exacerbates the vulgarity and decadence we in the West are suffering,
they should be locked up at least, if not sentenced to death.
Let us now listen to a man of good breeding, a true gentleman, who
was married for almost sixty years (until death.) - Nicolás Gómez Dávila:
The modern world will not be punished.
It is the punishment.
The problem is not sexual repression, nor sexual liberation,
but sex.
In a perfect penal code, vulgarity would be punished with the death
penalty.
When the modern consciousness suspends its economic routines,
it only oscillates between political anguish and sexual obsession.
Sexual promiscuity is the tip society pays in order to
appease its slaves.
To liberate man is to subject him to greed and sex.
Men can be divided into those who make their life complicated to
gain their soul and those who waste their soul to make their life easier.
Let us lament less the obscenity of today’s novelist than his misfortune.
When man becomes insignificant, copulation and defecation become important
actions.
Sex does not solve even sexual problems.
In the end, there is no area of the soul sex would not succeed in
corrupting.
Sins that appear “splendid” from afar are from close up nothing
more than small sordid episodes.
Modern man’s life oscillates between two poles: business
and sex.